Sunday, December 31, 2006

Why should I believe the bible?

Before the start of another year, it is important that we affirm what is important in our life!

Holy Scripture is the preeminent authority for every Christian, and the rule of faith and of all human perfection. –John Wycliffe

2 Tim 3:15-17 (ESV) tells us that all Scripture is breathed out by God:



10You, however, have followed my teaching, my conduct, my aim in life, my faith, my patience, my love, my steadfastness, 11my persecutions and sufferings that happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, and at Lystra—which persecutions I endured; yet from them all the Lord rescued me. 12Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, 13while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it 15and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work.

The Word of God is absolutely sufficient, it lack nothing.

We know the bible is true and trustworthy. The psalmist wrote: “All your words are true; all Your just laws will stand forever” (Psalm 119:160). In the New Testament, John writes, “Your word is truth.” (John 17:17, NIV).

Why should I believe the bible? There are reasons such as:


  • The proof from prophecy (many OT prophecies are fulfilled in the NT)
  • The unity of the Bible (there are no contradictions between the two testaments and among the different books in the bible. Being words empowered by the Holy Spirit, its message is uniform. The writers agree despite their
    -Different social standing
    -Different languages
    -Different writing styles
    From the two testaments, Christ is the principal message.
  • The indestructibility of the Bible (having lasted more than 2000 years)
  • The testimony from Church History (how it influenced countless lifes)
  • Proof from Science (eg. Earth is not flat!!)
  • Proof from Archeology (From paleography, the similarities between the many manuscripts/ codex [Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus ] is proof!)

But more than these reasons, I think it is still the Holy Spirit who helped us to believe the great truth that the bible is the living Word of God! May we read the bible with our heart and mind ... in 2007!

Friday, December 08, 2006

Stop believing?

In the Alister McGrath's The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World, he tells the story of Mary Ann Evans who became an atheist when she had entered adulthhood. By the way, if one may ask, who is Mary Ann Evans? Well... her pen name is George Elliot. Elliotwas a member of the Church of England from young. McGrath tells us that in an 1860 letter to a colleague in Geneva, Eliot spoke of “the strong hold Evangelical Christianity had on me from the age of fifteen to two and twenty.” McGrath wrote that Eliot was permanently alienated from God because:


While earlier forms of evangelicalism had been theologically generous, laying emphasis upon personal devotion to Jesus rather than fidelity to theological dogmas, a new stridency within the movement around this time led to a hardening of attitudes. The quality of a person’s faith was now judged by doctrinal correctness rather than a love for Christ. The warmheartedness of earlier versions of evangelicalism now gave way to increasingly dogmatic and impersonal construals of the Christian faith, which repelled as many as it attracted. (p. 128)

Is doctrine (Theology) important? I think it is! Erwin W. Lutzer (the senior pastor of Moody Memorial Church in Chicago) in his book Who Are You to Judge? (Moody), tells us that doctrine correctness is important. We shouldn't "sacrifice" truth for love. On the contrary, we have the responsibility to judge doctrine when they are wrong. We judge doctrine, judge behaviour, but we do not judge people! God does that! Dr. Lutzer reminds us that we must have biblical discernment. Among the notable statements that Dr. Lutzer made, one of them is A half-truth is more destructive than a whole lie, namely because a half truth is harder to recognize. If we just look around, this is exactly what is happening in many of the "mega" churches around us (in Singapore). These churches talk about Jesus, but they add a lot of other consumer-oriented "biblical truths". We mustn't let misguided tolerance plagues our church. Marsha West has written a two-part commentary titled “Whatever” Christianity (Part I, Part II) that laments the theological relativism commonly seen in many Christians. She pointed out that to post-modern Christians, even outright heresy becomes acceptable. Hmm... , it seems we have really forgotten we are warned that "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. (Matthew 7:15)

But didn't Jesus say "Who are you to judge?" "Do not judge or you to will be judged." When using these statements, many of us didn't exactly know what we meant. Defective hermeneutics is the cause! We take bible verses out of context. Jesus is only telling us "Don't become a Pharisee, but do make righteous judgments. " For me, I don't see one as unloving when he/she judges. We just need to learn discernment in a loving way. That is, when one is exposing error, one should do it with an intent to win back the brother. May we not lost the ability to judge the world because we have lost the ability to judge ourselves!

Doctrinal purity is important. If we (the church) is not correct in our doctrine, we run into the danger of preaching a false gospel, and a false gospel is not relevant to the world!

I believe there can be a balance of doctrinal correctness and a love for Christ. There is simply no clash! When we love God, we will be concerned about doctrinal correctness. When we know what is really "doctrinal correctness ", we learn to love God. We see the need and importance of loving God, because we know that Jesus Christ is the first Word. Jesus is the Word behind the words of Scripture. As Schleiermacher tells us, true religion is “an immediate relation to the living God, as distinct from submission to doctrinal or creedal propositions about God.”

Dr McGrath tells us that "many of Eliot’s misgivings about Christianity in general are best seen as specific response to the ideas of evangelicalism". For example, in an article in the Westminster Review for October 1855, Eliot offered a sustained criticism of a popular London evangelical preacher, John Cumming. Eliot took particular exception to Cumming’s insistence that only actions directed toward the glory of God might be deemed to be good. Eliot wrote:


Dr Cumming’s theory … is that actions are good or evil according as they are prompted or not prompted by an exclusive reference to the “glory of God.” God, then, in Dr Cumming’s conception, is a being who had no pleasure in the exercise of love and truthfulness and justice, considered as effecting the well-being of His creatures; he has satisfaction in us only so far as we exhaust our motives and dispositions of all relation to our fellow-beings, and replace sympathy with men by anxiety for the “glory of God.” (p. 130)

Dr McGrath wrote that Eliot deems this to be a rather harsh and unattractive God, who “instead of sharing and aiding our human sympathies is directly in collision with them; who instead of strengthening the bond between man and man, by encouraging the sense that they are both alike the objects of His love and care, thrusts himself between them and forbids them to feel for each other except as they have relation to Him.” (p. 130)

In other words, Eliot rejected Christianity because she did not want to believe in an idea of a sovereign God who could deal unaccountably with his creatures in any way he liked. As McGrath wrote, "many Victorians found this deeply disturbing and in open conflict with their increasingly developed sense of morality and justice". (p. 131) In many ways, contemporary Christians are like Eliot. We reject Christianity, we reject the bible, simply because the truths taught in the bible do not match our expectations. We believe we are more moral and have more justice than God! We believe we can be good without God! However, these beliefs just show we have entered postmodernism---there are no rights or wrongs; truth is defined as my personnel opinion, with no absolutes. We have forgotten (or have we ever believed?) the bible is God's revelation. We are currently in Dec, and this is the month where there are many baptism and confirmation. Those baptised are asked whether they believe in the canon of scripture. many answered "Yes!", but I do wonder how many really meant what they say! We need to be constantly reminded (it seems to me!) that the biblet is 1) Apostolic (authored by immediate apostles or close associates of the apostles. 2) Catholic (widely circulated among the early Christian assemblies. 3) Orthodox (does not contradict the faith of the early Christian tradition) Lastly, most importantly, there is also the Witness of the Holy Spirit. As such, faith in God and trusting the bible as God's revelation is not just a leap of faith. It has historical backings!

While doctrinal correctness is important, we mustn't forget that "The love within the church attracts the world, the holiness within the church convicts the world." We should never think "It is better to tolerate error than to look ugly defending the truth"! Also, if we are no longer loving, it just shows that we have not understood our bible at all! We may say that we know and believe in God (ie. know doctrines), but we do not. May God grant us a loving heart and a discerning mind! Amen!

Friday, December 01, 2006

Church Repels?

I am currently reading Alister McGrath's The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World. In church, we, too often, feel the coldness (rather than warmness) of the members. Is it because of nominalism, unregenerate Spirit, or we have simply forgotten and chosen to ignore the our Lord's admonition that we must love our neighbours as ourselves. Anyway, I think the only solution we have is to pray... ... in the hope that history doesn't repeat itself!

Paradoxically, history strongly suggests that those who are attracted to atheism are first repelled by theism. What propels people toward atheism is above all a sense of revulsion against the excess and failures of organized religion. Atheism is ultimately a worldview of fear –a fear, often merited, of what might happen if religious maniacs were to take over the world. The existence and appeal of atheism in the West is thus largely derivative, mirroring the failings of the churches and specific ways of conceiving the Christian faith. ---(Alister McGrath. The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World. p. 274)

Sunday, November 19, 2006

For whom did God die?

For whom did God die?


In my previous blog entry, I reflected on John 3:16 and its implication on the extent of Christ's work on the Cross.This blog will continue with the question of ‘for whom did God die’ still exists. For the Arminians, redemption is universal in scope (because God loves everyone) but not effective for every person (because not everyone responded with faith). For the Calvinist, redemption is particular in scope (because not everyone is chosen/elected), but always effective for the elect. The Arminians accused Calvinists that they are not fair, they say Calvinist attempt to limit God’s atonement. However, upon closer examination, one can see that their accusation has not been fair or accurate. Calvinists are not trying to make God look bad. Just as there is no contradiction between a loving God and the reality of hell, there is no contradiction between a loving God and the doctrine of election.


Firstly, if the redemption is universal in scope but not effective for every person (since Arminians believe we can reject salvation), the Arminians are also placing a limit on God’s atonement. There is no difference on the number of people saved, despite the Arminians’ claim to liberality. For the Arminians, it is Man choose God; for the Calvinist, it is God choose Man. From John 3:16 “that whoever believes in Him shall not perish”, it is also obvious that not everyone would be saved. Though the Arminian emphasized free will, the Calvinist’s view of irresistible grace is much more gracious than the Arminian’s belief of freewill salvation.


Secondly, “that whoever believes in Him shall not perish” (John 3:16) tells us that the gospel is to be preached to everyone. We should remind ourselves that election is not "information" from which we are to decide whether or not to respond to God in faith, or worry whether or not we are elect, or use as an excuse if we decide we are reprobate. Rather, it is the Gospel, the Good News that God has chosen to make salvation available in Christ by faith to all who respond and that ultimately we need not depend upon our own resources (since they are never sufficient) but upon the grace of God alone. How can one say that God is unfair when one cannot be sure that God did not elect him/her? If one thinks that God is unfair, they can believe in the Gospel and persevere!


Thirdly, there is the question of infant baptism. I believe that infant baptism supports the biblical view of election (thus particular atonement) based on God’s grace and divine sovereignty. The practice the baptism of infants in many of the Protestant Churches shows that John 3:16 “For God so loved the world” is not untrue as God saves the elect (such as infant) even before he can believe. Methodists (Wesleyans & Arminians) believe that God elect based on foreknowledge that the person will believe, but what if the infant are not able to live to an age (maybe to accidents or illnesses) where he can believe? Under the Arminian theological framework, how does God treat these cases? For the Calvinist (Presbyterians & Reformed Churches), the practice the baptism of infants does not face this problem since an infant is saved because it is based on God’s election and covenantal promise.


However, Methodists in Singapore practice infant baptism, as it is seen as ‘a sign of the child's belonging to the Church of God’1. Methodists in Singapore believed that:


It is the grace of God which even enables the believer to repent and receive God's grace. It is the grace that enables the believer to repent and receive God's grace. It is the grace that enables the believer to grow in faith and in doing God's will. [See A Methodist view of the Sacraments and Observances, Section on ‘Holy Baptism’ at http://www.trac-mcs.org.sg/discipleship/ms1.htm. Emphasis is bold is mine]


Thus, it seems that local Methodists’ view is much closer to the Calvinist (at least on paper!); they believe that infants (& all elected) are still saved because of God’s grace and sovereignty, and not because of God’s foreknowledge that we (including infants) would believe.

In his Institutes, Turretin distinguishes between those who have "the saving habit of acting faith" (or "actual faith") and those who have faith in its "principle and root," which an infant can possess since he "can have the Holy Spirit, with which to believe in his own time" (Institutes 19.20.19). Likewise, Junius says, "regarding the species of faith, it is to be considered both with regard to its first act and (as they say) its second." Infants are capable of faith as it in its first act and thus "it false to argue that infants are completely incapable of faith," though this is "God's secret and hidden thing" (Theses Theologicae 51.7). Johann Heinrich Alsted (1588-1638) similarly maintains that while infants may be "destitute of what is called 'actual faith', they are not on that account destitute of all faith...Faith in principle and seed, and virtually, is to be attributed to elect infants" (Theologia, Scholastica Didactica, 785).

The example of David’s situation in the OT clearly shows this. When his infant child died, David is given the confidence that he will see that child again in heaven. This story of David and dying child gives a tremendous consolation to parents who have lost infants to death. From David’s strong belief, it can also be seen that it is not by the infants’ innocence but by God’s grace that they are received into heaven. We come into this world with a sin nature, and so the baby that dies, dies as a sinful child. And when that child is received into heaven, he is received by grace. If a child is elected, he would surely be saved.


1 The Articles of Religion in the "Methodist Discipline" (1976, para 17) clearly state: "The baptism of young children is to be retained in the church." The objective work of God is available to infants. The child is initiated into the Body of Christ in a spiritual manner. An infant who is baptized has the parents or others as sponsors or godparents. At the baptism service they hold themselves responsible for safeguarding the welfare of the child, especially in its spiritual nurture. The congregation itself is held responsible for the Christian nurture of the child. The baptized child is enrolled as a preparatory member of the church. Infant baptism is:

  1. a dedication of the child to God

  2. a pledge of the parents and others to carry out their duties in the child's Christian nurture.

  3. a sign of the child's belonging to the Church of God

  4. a mark (seal) of the Holy Spirit's work in the child.

In every baptism there is the establishment of a mystical union of the baptized person with Christ. Here again it is an act of faith that God can do more than we expect through His grace and might. (Mark 10:13-16). [Source: A Methodist view of the Sacraments and Observances, http://www.trac-mcs.org.sg/discipleship/ms1.htm]

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Reflection on John 3:16

Most Christians believe that God sent his Son to save us. If we believe in him (John 3) through faith [1], we would be saved. But on the point of ‘for whom is the redemption applied to’, there is some disagreement. This is not without reason. In the bible, there seem to be various verses that teach a universal reference for the saving work of Jesus Christ (John 12:32; Rom 3:22-24; 5:18; 8:32; I Cor. 15:22; 2 Cor. 5:14-15; I Tim. 2:5-6; Tit. 2:11; Heb. 2:9) or a universal saving will on God’s part (Rom. 11:32; 1 Tim 2:4; 2 Pet. 3:9).(Dr Robert Reymond’s A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith [ANSTCF], p. 685)


So, for whom did God die? Maybe it will be good to start examining this issue by turning to biblical passages, and beginning with our most familiar passage, John chapter 3, focusing especially on verse 16.


John 3:10-20 (New International Version)


10"You are Israel's teacher," said Jesus, "and do you not understand these things? 11 I tell you the truth, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. 12I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? 13No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. 14Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, 15that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son. 19This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.

John 3:16

The word ‘world’ quite likely has the same meaning as in I John 2:15. Warfield, for example, commented that:


[The term “world”] is not here a term of extension as much as a term of intensity. Its primary connotation is ethical, and the point of its employment is not to suggest that the world is so big that it takes a great deal of love to embrace it all, but that the word is so bad that it takes a great kind of love to love it all, and much more to love it as God has loved it when he gave his son for it. … The passage was not intended to teach, and certainly does not teach, that God loves all men alike and visits each and everyone alike with the same manifestation of love: and as little was intended to teach or does it teach that his love is confined to a few especially chosen individuals selected out of the world. What it is intended to do is to arouse in our hearts a wondering sense of the marvel and mystery of the love of God for the sinful world –conceived here, not quantitative but qualitatively as, in its very distinguishing characteristic, sinful. [See B B Warfield, “God’s Immeasurable Love,” in Biblical and Theological Studies (Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1952), p. 516, emphasis in bold is mine]


Indeed, the “wondering sense of the marvel and mystery of the love of God for the sinful world” is stressed in chapters 13-17 of the John Gospel. As Dr D A Carson wrote:


Both the verb ‘to love’ (agapaō) and the noun ‘love’ (agapē) occur much more frequently in chs. 13-17 than anywhere else in the Fourth Gospel, reflecting the fact that John devotes special attention to the love relationships amongst the Father, the Son and the disciples. (PNTC, 1991, p. 204)


Warfield is not alone in this interpretation. John Gill, an eminent 18th century Baptist theologian, in his commentary on John, wrote: “Not every man in the world is here meant, or all the individuals of human nature; for all are not the objects of God’s special love, which is here designed.” Therefore, it is most likely Warfield is correct in saying that "world" in John 3:16 means "sinner"—without stating which ones. It seems that the "world" in John 3:16 is not to teach ‘election’ or ‘universal redemption’. John 3:16 would be analogous to Rom. 5:6 (‘For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.’) where Paul states that Christ died for the "ungodly"—without stating which ones.


The “For God so loved the world” in John 3:16 show that God loves both the elect and the non-elect. There is no doubt on this, since other bible passages (both OT & NT) support this. In the OT, for example, we have Psalm 145:9: “The Lord is good to all, and his mercy is over all that he has made.” In the NT, we have Luke 6:35 (“he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil”). Here, God teaches us love our enemies for even God himself loves all (includes the elect).


How do we define the “world” (cosmos) in John 3:16? The general redemption view assumes that this word must refer to each and every person that ever lived. However, this is not the biblical meaning. The BAGD defines “cosmos” in John 3:16 as referencing “all mankind, but especially of believers, as the objects of God’s love.” This, however, is a theological interpretation. From TDNT (vol. 3) and BAGD (pp. 446-447), it is clear that in the entire NT, there is no instances of cosmos referring to every single person who has ever lived.


How do we explain “For God so loved the world” in John 3:16? NT scholar Dr D A Carson pointed out that:

Because John 3:16 is sandwiched between vv.14-15 and v. 17, the fact that God gave his one and only Son is tied both to the Son’s incarnation (v. 17) and to his death (vv. 14-15). That is the immediate result of the love of God for the world: the mission of the Son. His ultimate purpose is the salvation of those in the world who believes in him […] (PNTC, p. 206, italics mine)


Indeed, if we were to look at the surrounding verses of John 3:16 (NASB), we see the repeated occurrence of the word ‘believe’ and ‘Son of God’:


v. 12: "If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?

v.13: " No one has ascended into heaven, but He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man.

v.14: "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up;

v.15: so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life.

v. 16: "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.

v. 17: "For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.

v. 18: "He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.


In 7 verses (btw John 3: 12-18), the word ‘believe’ occurs 5 times and ‘Son of God’ (or ‘Son’) occurs 5 times. Though it seems much fairer to say God want to save everyone, the bible clearly shows that the ones who are saved (John 3:3,5, 15,16,17) are only those who “believes in him” (John 3:15, 16,18) and not everyone.


John 3:15-18 (NIV):

15that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.


John 3:15-18 (NASB):

15 so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life. 16"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. 17"For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. 18"He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.


As a conclusion, it can be seen that at the Synod of Dort, Calvinists is right to affirm that Christ’s death is sufficient for all but efficient only for the elect.

[1] There are 3 elements of faith: knowledge (the intellectual element; Mind), assent (the emotional element; Heart) and trust (the voluntary/volitional element; Will).

Friday, November 10, 2006

Is God really bad?

Atheist Thomas Jefferson described God as “cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust.” (cited in George Smith, Atheism: The Case Against God. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989, pp. 76-78.) Jefferson cited Isaiah 45:7, where God says “I form light and create darkness, I make well-being and create calamity, I am the Lord, who does all these things.”(ESV)

However, in this verse, the Hebrew word for “calamity” (ESV) or “disaster” (NIV) does not mean “moral evil.” In fact, Hebrew linguist tell us that the word need not have any moral connotations at all. The ESV seems more accurate as this word would be perfectly fitting for the plagues that God inflicted on the Egyptians through Moses. These plagues involved not moral evil but rather calamitous events engineered to bring the Egyptians to repentance. God as judge of the earth can rightly inflict such plagues on sinful human beings without having his character impugned with accusations of evil. Certainly such plagues may seem evil to those experiencing them, but the reality is that these people were experiencing due justice.

If we were to read the bible as a whole (& not out of context), we would understand that God is morally perfect. The bible is clear that God is morally perfect (cf. Deut. 32:4; Matt. 5:48), and it is impossible for him to sin (Heb 6:18). He punish sin because his absolute justice demands that. In the case of the Egyptians, God was merely bringing just justice on unrepentant sinners. God’s good end –the deliverance of the Israelites from Egyptian bondage –was the result of this judgment.

Monday, October 02, 2006

Till d.... do we part?

"Till d.... do we part?" If I am given this sentence, and asked to fill in the blank, I think there would be two answers. In the past, it was "Till death do we part." Now it seems that it is "Till divorce do we part" . Marital permanence seems to be a thing of the past!

At the Channel NewsAsia website More marriages, more divorces last year (25 Sept 2006), it was reported that "Even as more people are getting married, divorces have also been on the rise." According to the report, 8.16 percent more marriages ended in divorce in 2005 than in 2004. The number of divorces rose to 6,909 in 2005 from 6,388 a year ago. Even more worrying is that "This is also the largest increase in the past decade". The question to ask is why is more people choosing divorce? I think Chares Colson gave a very good answer in his book Lies That Go Unchallenged in Popular Culture (Tyndale), he wrote that:
When marriage is managed by a marketplace mentality, we view it as a contract instead of as a covenant, making sure that we do only the minimum necessary for our role and that we don’t get cheated out of our rights and privileges. (Colson, p. 87)
I beilieved the contempoprary worldview of autonomy and self-centeredness has fuled divorce rate. However, the bible view marriage differently from the postmoderns.

Another "interesting" point to note is that "younger couples, aged between 20 and 24, registered the highest divorce rate last year". Hmm ... is there something wrong with the values of the younger couples? How do they perceive marriage?

In Charles Colson's book Lies That Go Unchallenged in Popular Culture (Tyndale), he wrote that:
Our country has reached a state of marital emergency in which marriage is trivalised. Preparation and commitment are seriously lacking, but government and church now have an opportunity to revive and support the institution. (Colson, p. 59)
Though Colson's book was written in the context of the US, it seems what is happening in the US is also happening here in Singpore. ... marriage is trivalised.

As to why younger couples, aged between 20 and 24, registered the highest divorce rate last year, I think the reason is indeed "Preparation and commitment are seriously lacking". People no longer treat marriage with the 'respect' it use to have.

Many Christians have also forgotten that marriage is a permanent relationship, that it is a life-longcommitment. (Read Gen 1:24 & Matt 19:5-6).

In many cases of divorce, marriage is no longer a covenant or a solemn vow , but only a “contract”. Charles Colson describes this change as a "rhetoric shift", and this has led couples to see marriage as just a voluntary agreement between two adults. As Colson puts it,

"If marriage is a contract, then the parties are free to negotiate the terms of their agreement, enforce those terms, and terminate the agreement whenever they choose. [... ...] If marriage is simply a contract, then it’s impossible to limit the terms of that contract to one man and one woman in a lifelong committed relationship. Instead, anything goes." (p. 86)

If marriage is not a “contract”, what is it? A sacrament? A covenant?

For the Roman Catholics, marriage is a sacrament (officially codified at the Council of Trent). However, this view of marriage as a sacrament is influenced by Augustine's writings (such as his De Bono conjugali ["On the Good of Marriage"]). However, this view has its defects. One defect is that the bible does not say that the institution of marriage dispenses divine grace.

For Christians, marriage is a covenant, not just a contract or a piece of paper. Marriage is instituted by God. It is a Christ-ordained institution. We need to rememer the words "we are gathered today in the presence of God and of this witness to unite this man and this woman in the holy bonds of marriage...". We are also told "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers" (2 Corinthians 6:14). In the Old Testament tradition, the children of Israel were called to seek eives from their own nation, that is people of the same religious persuasion. This is why it is sometimes so difficult for us Christians to explain to our friends (mostly non chirstian) why christians should not date non christains (vice versa) be it guys or gals. Non-Christians feel we are just narrow minded with such a thinking.

There are a few points which I think may the reason as to why christians should not date (or marry) non-Christains:

1) Prayer Life: You cannot pray with him/her, he/she cannot pray for you
2) Spiritual Growth: You cannot achieve spiritual intimacy with God together.
3) Serving the Lord: You cannot serve God with him/her, he/she cannot understand why you obey God, and there will be conflicts.
4) Perservering Together: The person you date MUST have fervent and reverence for God and obedience as well. Then can the Holy Spirit work out well in both to forgive, rebuke with love, build each other up, and grow together.

For Non-Christians, marriage is not a covenant or a solemn vow , but only a “contract” (which is the prevailing secular view. Everything we choose is a matter of choice!). The view that marriage is a contract has its root in the civil law, which sees marraige as a contract that is bilateral, voluntarily formed, maintained, and dissolved by two individuals.The source of this thinking can be traced back to the medieval ecclesiastical courts and Enlightenment thinking. Firstly, we know that marriage is thus not just between me and my girlfriend/boyfriend, but between me, my girlfriend/boyfriend, and God. It is not simply a bilateral but a trilateral relationship. Secondly, we forget that marriage is a divine institution. We thought that it is just our own private choice! Thus, we cannot marriage cannot be voluntarily formed, maintained, and dissolved by two individuals. In a sense (biblical), we are not free to negotiate the terms of their agreement, enforce those terms, and terminate the agreement whenever we choose. Marraige is regulated by God's commandments. Worringly, it seems that for many Christians, marriage has also ceased to be a covenant or a solemn vow and has instead become a “contract”. This is not surprising when one considers the fact that biblical literacy is dropping. Younger Christians, in general, do not have a good understanding of the biblical doctine of marriage. (Gen 2:18-25)

We should remember that marriage is a covenantal relationship. Though the New Testament writers do not explicitly label marriage as a covenant(though the concept is still present in NT verses such as Matt 19:6//Mark10:9), they do describe it as being similar to a covenant (cf. Eph. 5:22-33). If we turn to Mal 2:14, it speaks of marriage as a covenant: “Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the LORD hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou has dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant.” (KJV) Because marriage is a covenant, witness is needed, and this make marriage vows are significant, and this should be done in a formal ceremony (though it doesn't have to be in church, since marriage is instituted for all people, whether they are Christians or non-Christians), in the presence of witness. Without the witnesses there is no legal covenant, no legal commitment, no formal binding responsibility for one to keep his promises. However, isn't covenant only for commitments between God and Human beings (eg., Noahic, Abrahamic, Mosaic)? Interestingly, the answer is no. It also refers to a variety of agreements between humans (Gen21:22-24; 2 Kings 11:17). When it includes marriage, besides Mal 2:14 stated above, Prov. 2:16-17 and Ezek. 16:8 are also texts we can refer to.

Ezek 16:8 reads:
8"Then I passed by you and saw you, and behold, you were at the time for love; so I spread My skirt over you and covered your nakedness I also swore to you and entered into a covenant with you so that you became Mine," declares the Lord GOD.

To avoid/prevent divorce, what can we do? There are a few things that we mustn't forget. First, we must remember that the home is God’s idea, it is not a human invention or a cultural phenomenon. In the plan of creation God designed the home as the foundation of society, to meet the mental, spiritual, physical, emotional needs of men, women and children.

We need to be reminded that the family is not designed for temporary convenience—to be kept together so long as it’s fun and pleasing. The family’s strength is its permanence. God designed the family as a lasting relationship in which, with His care, humans could weather the storms of life together. The home is God’s loving shelter for growing to maturity.The home is a place for spiritual growth. If one marry a non-Christian, one cannot achieve spiritual intimacy with God together. As such, this intended purpose of the family/home is lost!

Although the family is a lasting relationship, it is not an automatic success. The daily parts and pieces of life just don’t automatically fall into place. Loving and living with your partner and children takes determination and practice, plus time and imagination, sacrifice and planning, and much more.

But love and determination by themselves aren’t enough to build the relationship God intended. God not only designed the home, but He desires to be at the center of family life—guiding, sustaining, filling the home with His love, peace, forgiveness. [...]

As we seek to make Jesus Christ Lord of our life and home, we need to search the Bible daily for guidance in our family life. For God’s instructions to each family member, read Ephesians 5:15-6:4 and Colossians 3:12-21. Prayer is important for evey aspect of our life. Prayer is the steering wheel of our life, it is not a spare tyre. Prayer is the first and key to our Christian life, it is not an option . Thus, we need to p
ray that God would help us fulfill our family responsibility, realizing that He wants to help our family weave our lives into one harmonious design.

If we are from a Christian family, we need to encourage our family to begin a time of daily prayer and Bible study. As our family shares praise and personal needs in prayer and searches God’s Word, we will be growing closer to the Lord and to each other.

Equally important, we should attend a Bible-believing church (non-liberal! With faithful, systematic expository preaching of biblical texts.) together with our spouse (
and even father, mother, sister, brother... I like the concept of a "Family Service" where different generations of a Christian family worship together. Age-specific worship Service, such as Youth Worship, may be more purpose-directed and able to attract more members, but I doubt this would the method we would be worshipping God in "heaven"!), so that we may find the encouragement and fellowship of other Christians, and instruction in God’s Word.

With Christ as Lord of our family, we can have a happy home. As we daily yield to Him, our home will be filled with God’s love and wisdom. Our home will be more than just a place. It will be a family—living, growing, learning and creating together with God. (Source: Tract Text, How to Have a Happy Home, by Good News Publisher)

To gain a better perspective on what the bible says about marriage and family, one excellent book is Andreas J Kostenberger's boook God, Marriage, and Family: Rebuilding the Biblical Foundation (Crossway, 2004). This is a must-read! Besides giving us a biblical perspective on what the bible says about divorce and remarriage, it also covers issues such as childrearing, singleness, and homosexuality. I am also aware of Geoffrey Bromiley's
God and Marriage. It seems to be also a good book, but I have not had the chance to read it! As it is a bit dated, many of challenges facing the contemporary family are not dealt with in this book.

Though the bible may not be clear on every family issues we can think of, it definitely provides guidelines. However, we need to read the bible ourselves. For many of the times, there is no fast solutions to our daily problems or easy-to follow step-by-step formula to our daily choices. For example, in Chris Wright's Old Testament Ethics for the People of God (IVP: May 2004), he wrote that:

The authority of the Scripture is that which authorizes us to develop our ethical stances, policy choices and decision-making in new contexts not directly addressed by the Bible. The authority of the Old Testament for ethics does not pre-define every choice we have to make. But the more sharply we can articulate the very particularity of Israel, and understand the reasons for the laws they had, the more confident we can be in making ethical choices which are ‘authorized' – that is, that are legitimate within the contours and limits of the paradigm God has given us. [More] [Rev. Chris Wright is the International Ministries Director for Langham Partnership International ]
Back to the question of "Can Christians divorce?". This is not a new question. In Matthew's Gospel, ofr example, the Pharisees come to Jesus, and asked, "Is it lawful to put away one's wife in the case of infidelity?" [We know that the Pharisees are trying to trick Jesus into speaking against the law of Moses.] On the very surface, the answer seems to be a 'no', but we know that not every Christians agrees on how we should understand what the Bible says about divorce and remarriage. The answer is also not a simplistic 'yes' or 'no'. For example, if one were to go to a Christian bookstore and look on the bookselves, there are 'tons' of books on this issue. One particular book which caught my attention was Divorce and Remarriage (IVP, edited by H Wayne House). In this book, four authors present their distinct perspectives.

1) Carl Laney argues that the Bible indicates that marriages are always intended to be permanent, that there is never a need for divorce and that remarriage is never permissible after divorce.
2) William Heth contends that while there are legitimate biblical grounds for divorce, there are no legitimate grounds for remarriage after divorce.
3) Thomas Edgar defends the position that Scripture allows for divorce and remarriage in cases of adultry or desertion.
4) Larry Richards holds that Scripture, while decrying divorce and the pain it causes, points to a God of grace who will not condemn those who divorce and remarry.

For me, I am for Thomas Edgar 's view. I believe that Scripture allows for divorce and remarriage in cases of adultry, desertion and death of spouse. For this view, I turn to Deut 24, Mal 2:14-16, Mark 10:9, 11-12, Matt19:9, 1 Cor 7:10-39 (esp. v10-11; v12-16; v39). One of the reason the Bible takes a dim view of adultery because it is the supreme act of infideility that breaks the trust and breaks the faith upon which marriage is built. Marriage is a gift from God, but it is regulated by God's commandments. We do not use it however we want to!

What about physical abuse then? Is physical abuse legitimate grounds for divorce? Though abuse within is a dreadful reality, it seems God doesn't include physical abuse as a legitimate ground for divorce. If the physical abuse happens in a Christian home, then there is a need for church discipline (though many of the present-day churches seem more interested in trying to please their members [for more offerings & 'support'!] rather than discipline them!) in order to protect the person who is being abused. If this fails or if people is outside the church, then the use of legal system may be unavoidable! Temporary separation is also possible if the abusing partner refuses to mend their ways. One reason why God did not allow divorce for physical abuse maybe that God sees it as a problem that can be overcome. There are indeed many cases where marriages have been redeemed after people have repented and overcome their destructive patterns of behaviour.

In a marriage, as in the relationship between God and us, forgiveness is of utmost importance. When we look to the Creation account, we are reminded of the sanctity of marriage. This is also why Jesus said "But from the beginning it was not so" (Matt. 19:8). Jesus reminds us that the original intention of marriage did not include divorce. So, just as Jesus told the woman taken in adultery who was repentant: “Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more” (John8:10-11), we should be forgiving towards those who truly repents. After all, reconciliation, restoration, and forgiveness are supposed to be the identifiers a true Christian (Luke 11:4; Galatians 5:22-23; Ephesians 4:32). May the 'd....' in "Till d.... do we part?" be 'death' and not' divorce'. May God give those married the strength and the wisdom needed for a lasting marriage.

Friday, September 01, 2006

A Chronology: What happened in Sinagpore's Church History

1819: Raffles’ founding of Singapore

1821: The Catholics. Cathedral of the Good Shepherd along Victoria St.

1834: The American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Mission

1837: The Church Missionary Society (CMS)

1856: The Anglican Church
1856: The Presbyterian Church. The Orchard Road Presbyterian Church (ORPC) was also founded in 1856.

1857: The Plymouth Brethren (Philip and Elisa Robinson)

1885: The first Methodist missionaries from the South Indian Conference arrived in Singapore/ Malaya, including Thoburn and Oldham. The first Methodist school, the Anglo-Chinese School, was established. In 1976, the Methodist Church in Singapore (MCS) was formed.

1908: The Seventh-day Adventists

1928/1933: The Assemblies of God, began their ministry here in 1928 with the arrival of a missionary couple, Cecil and Edith Jackson.

1933: The Student Christian Movement (SCM) began its influence in Sinagpore.

1935: The Salvation Army

1948 (4 Oct): Trinity theological college (TTC) was founded

1948: The Inauguration of the Malayan Christian Council (Founding members include the Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church, Anglican Diocese of Singapore, Bible Society, YMCA, YWCA)

1950: Southern Baptists

1950: Bible-Presbyterian Church

1952: The United Lutheran Church of America started their missionary work in Singapore.

1952: Singapore Bible College (SBC) was set up.

1952: The start of prison ministry in Singapore. 20 volunteers responded to the authorities’ invitation to provide spiritual guidance to those in prison. Rev. Khoo Siaw Hua (the prison chaplain) was one of them.

1952: The Varsity Christian Fellowship was formed. (to counter SCM)

The 1950s: The Finnish Pentecostal Mission. (from mainland China)

The 1950s: The Evangelical Free Wing

Jan 1955: The birth of Bible-Presbyterian (BP) Church movement in Singapore/Malaya.

1956: Church of Christ

1956: Youth for Christ (YFC). Rev. Joe Weatherly came to Singapore at the invitation of a group of local Christians. In 1957, the YFC had their Saturday Night Rally.

1957: Graduate Christian Fellowship (GCF). [Rev. Paul Contento]

1958: The Bible Church

1960: Christian Nationals’ Evangelism Commission (CNEC)

Sept 1962: The Far Eastern Bible College (FEBC) at Gilstead Rd was opened by the BP church.

1966: Wesley Methodist Church & St Andrew Cathedral jointly sponsored a project called the Churches’ Counseling Service.

The 1970s: The development of the house churches

The 1970s: The starting of Charismatic influence in Singapore. [The outburst of tongues at ACS. Anglican Bishop Chiu Ban It's experience in Bangkok.] In June and July 1973, the Anglican Church held a series of "Prayers for Healing Services". In 1974, weekly "Prayer and Praise" services were held at SAC.

1970-1980: The Assembly of God churches adopted home cell groups and enjoyed rapid growth.

1970-1978: The number of Protestant Churches rose from 186 to 261.

1974: The Presbyterian Community Services began with one centre at Bt Merah View.

1977: "Here's Life, Singapore" movement

1978: Rev. Paul Cho Yong-gi of Korea (I think his theology is not biblical and would label him a heretic!) came to Singapore to teach church growth.

Dec 1978: Billy Graham Crusade at the National Stadium

1980: The June 1980 census of population showed that there were 203,517 persons who declared themselves to be Christians.

1982: Evangelical Reformed Churches in Singapore (ERCS)

1984: The New Creation Church was founded by a group of young pastors: Joseph Prince, Henry Yeo & Joshua Lee. From 1990-2003, its weekly attendance rose from 150 to 8000.

1986: FCBC was established by 50-year old Rev Lawrence Khong. In 1988, it became a cell group church.

1989: City Harvest Church was started by 25-year old Kong Hee. From 1989-2003, its weekly attendance increased from 20 to 13,000.

26 Dec 1989: The government released a White Paper entitled Maintenance of Religion Harmony. [2 trends were highlighted: 1. Increase in religious fervour and assertiveness among various religious group. 2. Increased political activism among bt certain religious groups.] The Maintenance of Religion Harmony Bill was introduced in Parliament.

1991: The Methodist Missions Society (MMS) was set up. Rev. Clarence Lim was the chaplain.

1991: Fei Yue (Chinese Christian Mission) was set up at Bt Batok. [It now offers counseling ministry, family life education, etc.]

1991: The Trinity theological college (TTC) received its first post-graduate student from China.

1992: St Andrew's Community Hospital (by the Singapore Anglican Welfare Council) was opened.

1995: The LoveSingapore organisation was started through the initiative of Lawrence Khong (of FCBC). At its peak, 150 churches participated in its activities. On 5 Aug 1995, thousands packed the Singapore indoor Stadium for "Day To Change Our World" concert prayer. Lawrence Khong and Edmund Chan (of Covenant Evangelical Free Church) represented the charismatics and non-charismatics respectively.

1996: The 220-bed St Luke's Hospital for the Elderly was set up.

2000: The population census for 2000 showed that the population rose from 3,047,132 (1990) to 4,017,733. Reason: More relaxed immigration policy which sought to attract foreign talent.

2000: From 1990-2000, the number of community service centres increased from 22 to 118.

Sept 2000: The Trinity theological college (TTC) moved to its new campus at Upper Bt Timah Rd.

2001: From 1990 to 2001, the number of Christian congregations rose from 331 to 450. Total membership increased from 95,123 to 152,371. [Note: 1970:186 churches. 1978: 261churches.]

2002: The Singapore Bible College (SBC) celebrated its 50th anniversaries.It has a student enrolment of above 400 (from 22 countries & 4 continents).

[.... ... to be updated!]


For the past few days...

I have just updated my blog The Earliest Church in Singapore . Overall, I think there is an addition of 30% of words. Very much more can still be added. However, the section on the Bible-Presbyterian Church is still yet undone! This was not without reason. I wanted to have an overview of the church scene in early Singapore before proceeding on the individual denomination. I also wanted to know more about what is happening the major denominations then. I have also divided the entry into parts! The role & responsibility part is now in another entry. As I continue on my reading & reflection, this entry The Earliest Church in Singapore will again be updated! For people who blog, they usually add new post, but I think updating an old post is just as interesting! It gives me an opportunity to think why I wrote something in a certain way.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Books on Creation & Evolution

Some more books on my reading list that are related to the topic of Creation & Evolution.....

1) Signmund Brouwer. The Unrandom Universe. Eugene: Harvest House Publishers, 2002.

2) William A. Dembski, editor. Mere Creation. InterVarsity Press, 1998.

3) Hugh Ross. The Fingerprint of God. Orange: Promise Publishing Company, 1991.

4) Grant R Jeffrey. Creation: Remarkable Evidence of God’s Design. Toronto: Frontier Research Publications 2003.

5) Philip Johnson. Darwin on Trial. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway, 1991. Also from IVP (1991).

6) Henry M Morris. Scientific Creationism. San Diego: Creation-Life Publishers, 1978.

7)B. G. Ranganathan, Origins?. Carlisle: Banner of Truth Trust, 1988.
The Second Edition is available from the publisher Pleasant Word (2003) .

Book Description:
Many in our modern society believe that science has disproved the Bible. Instead of believing in God, many place their faith in evolution. Although both evolution and creation ultimately are positions of faith and cannot be scientifically proved or disproved, the scientific evidences from various fields of modern science (e.g. genetics, paleontology, thermodynamics, etc.) better support faith in creation rather than faith in chance or evolution. Basically, evolution in nature is only possible within species but not across species as Darwin had predicted. "Origins?" asks and answers a series of penetrating questions:

Are there natural and genetic limits to biological change and variation in nature?
Is evolution consistent with other major scientific principles?
Do comparative similarities in DNA between species prove that all living things share a common evolutionary and biological ancestry?
Has science proved that life can come into existence from non-living matter?
What does the fossil record really prove?
Is nature capable of performing genetic engineering?
Do all scientists believe in evolution?


Instead of easily accepting the explanations of evolution the reader will be challenged with the logical and scientific case for creation. Modern society can once again have reason to place its faith in God, the Creator.

About the Author: The author, B.G. Ranganathan (pronounced "Ranga-nathan") was born in Madras, India, and at a young age emigrated with his family to the United States. Mr. Ranganathan was raised in a traditional Hindu family but during his early teenage years he recognized his need for salvation and received the Lord Jesus Christ into his heart as his personal Lord and Savior. He received his B.A. with academic concentrations in theology and biology and has given lectures and seminars to science faculty and students at various secular colleges and universities on the scientific merits of creation vs. evolution. As a science and religion writer Mr. Ranganathan has been recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis' Who's Who In The East.

Another interesting new book is on the author of the book Darwin on Trial (1991), Philip Johnson (a Cal Berkeley legal scholar). This new book Darwin's Nemesis (IVP) is edited by William Dembski.

Synopsis from the publisher:

With the publication of Darwin on Trial in 1991, Cal Berkeley legal scholar Phillip Johnson became the leading figure in the intelligent design movement. Exposing and calling into question the philosophical foundations of Darwinism, Johnson led the charge against this largely unquestioned philosophy of materialistic reductionism and its purported basis in scientific research.

This book reviews and celebrates the life and thought of Phillip Johnson and the movement for which he has served as chief architect. Editors William A. Dembski and Jed C. Macosko present eighteen essays by those who have known and worked with Phil for more than a decade. They provide personal and in-depth insight into the man, his convictions and his leadership of the intellectual movement that called into question the hegemony of Darwinian theory.




Other books on this issue include:

1) Michael Denton. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (Bethesada, MD: Adler & Adler, 1985). This is a must-read!
2) Thaxton, W. Bradley, & R. Olsen. The Mystery of Life's Origin. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1984).
3) Del Ratssch. The Battle of Beginnings. (IVP, 1996)
4) Philip Johnson. Defeating Darwinism-Opening Minds. (IVP, 1997). A good book for beginners.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

God's Creation-Its Relevance

For the past weeks, I have been reading up on how creation & the bible is related. As I read, I find that the less I know. My reading schedule include the relevant biblical text, such as the book of Genesis, Hebrews, etc. I also scanned through pages of systematic theology. Wayne Grudem, Millard Erickson and Robert Reymond are all on my reading list. Then, I too see a need for books from William Demski (His Intelligent Design: The Bridge between Science & Theology. InterVarsity Press, 1999) & etc. As I would be writing the article in Chinese (which I plan to submit to my church for its quarterly newlstter!), I also read up how the various oriental philosophy (Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism) view how the universe came into being, so as to provide an Eastern perspective. As I read & write, I see the article becoming longer and longer. At present, it about 5000+ words. .... However, it seem a bit too long to be included in a newsletter! So, I think I would be spending time trying to make it as concise and comprehensive as possible.... not an easy job!

My outline is as follows:

从上帝的“创造”看神的大能
从上帝的“创造”看哲学---佛教的“无常”和“无我”
从上帝的“创造”看圣经与科学
神的启示——圣经

创造的意义
a) 从上帝的“创造”看神的荣耀
b) 从上帝的“创造”看生命的意义
c) 从上帝的“创造”看世界:真实和“甚好”
d) 从上帝的“创造”看他的护理
——盼望的来源
——让我们得以自由的盼望
e) 从上帝的“创造”看神与人的关系

g) 我们的回应

Friday, July 07, 2006

What are we lacking?- The Church's Role & Responsibility

ON 13 June, I wrote on the Earliest Church in Singapore. Here, I reflect on the church's reponse & responsibilities. This is just some of my thoughts. Some of them are on what I see is lacking in the churches of Singapore. They are of course not exhaustive..., but there are nonetheless what I feel is the essentials!

Our Response & Responsibility

1) Giving Glory to God for what he has done

What does this entails? Is it only achieving success, health, wealth, and status? What about the ability to endure suffering, having the courage to face problems, …

2) The importance of a Living Theology (Bibllical & Systematic; NT & OT)

Theology (church doctrine) is not dull and irrelevant if it is living. Dorothy Sayers, a 20th-century, Oxford-educated dramatist, novelist, and lay theologian, reminds us that "The dogma is the drama!" Theology is the drama of God's remdptive act in history (since the beginning of time).

Theology is not simply the concern or the domain of a small group of academic experts. Rather, theology, by its very nature and function, is for everyone. Theology still matters today, as it did in the past. After all, an undogmatic Christianity is no Christianity at all. Christianity is about Christ, a living person. As a historical person with historical facts (i.e. his incarnation & atonement, also called doctrines) surrounding it, Christianity cannot as facts separating from doctrines. As B B Warfield puts it, “Christianity consists in facts that are doctrines and in doctrines that are facts” (I have benefited much from Dr Gary L W Johnson’s writing “Does Theology still Matter?” in the book The Coming Evangelical Crisis: Current Challenges to the Authority of the Scripture and the Gospel, edited by Dr John H Armstrong (Moody, 1996), p.57-73.).

Of course, ‘theology’ can be wrong at times too. For example, theological liberialism has questioned the authority of the bible. The theology we need be grounded in scripture. It should be biblical, exegetical, systematic, practical, and covers both OT & NT. Theology should not be speculative, or based entirely on human reasoning & logic.

The importance of theology could also be seen in the launching of the annual Earnest Lau Professorship Lectures by TTC. Its aim is to bring theology to the level that pastors and informed lay leaders could appreciate. The first annual lecture is entitled “Rediscovering the Catechumenate: How to Help New Converts Discover their Real Christian Identity”, and held on Jan 19, 2005. The speaker was Rev Dr Simon Chan, Earnest Lau Professor of Systematic Theology at TTC. The focus of the lecture is on the relationship between theology and some aspects of the church life and pastoral practice so that Christians can be encouraged to think through pastoral issues theologically and formulate theologically informed responses rather than merely resort to pragmatic solutions.

3) God’s Word

(a)- Authority & Sufficiency

God’s Word, as revealed in the Old & New Testament, is the authority for the church. The authority of any teacher (pastor, cell group leader, bishop, elder, deacon, even bible scholar! Of course, we should also examine our very own scriptural understanding with the bible. We could be wrong too!) must be judged by its faithfulness to the Scriptures.

The bible is true, sufficient and clear, there is no need for further revelation. There should be distinction between the canonical texts and what Christian writers say (in Christian literature), what pastors say (in sermons), what we ‘hear’ God say (‘so-called prophesy’; hearing from God). Christian writers, and preachers/pastors are channels of the Holy Spirit’s teaching (Spiritus Sancti fistulae), but we should always remember that sometimes, they may too have wrong interpretations (which arose from a lack of prayerful study of the bible, and thus erroneous understanding) Thus, when pastors begin their sermons, we sometimes hear this prayer, “Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in your sight, O Lord, my rock and my redeemer.” (Psalms 19:14, ESV)

(b)- Trusting & Studying

Sunday-morning sermons, though important, are never replacements for devoting time to consistent bible study.

Psalms 78:1 (ESV): Give ear, O my people, to my teaching; incline your ears to the words of my mouth!

Job 23:12 (ESV): I have not departed from the commandment of his lips; I have treasured the words of his mouth more than my portion of food.

(c)- Faithful Expository (Exegetical) Preaching in the pulpit

“Pastors are called to a ministry of exposition, not entertainment. We are to be warm containers of divine treasures. We must be touched and transformed by the message. It is a high calling to be a preacher of the Word.” (from Bishop Robert Solomon’s sermon at the Ordination and Closing Service of the 29th Session of the CAC in 2004, Methodist Message, Issue Vol. 107 No 1, Jan 2005) The reason why John Sung was so successful in his evangelistic effort was due to his Bible-centered preaching. He took the bible seriously and expound the bible chapter by chapter. When he preached in Singapore in 1935, he could preach for 80 minutes for each meeting, three times a day, and each meeting being two and a half hours. About 2000 listened to him each night. According to Bobby Sng in his In His Good Time: “Many brought their own food packages, for fear of losing their seats if they left the church hall. Some even brought mats and slept through the nights. About half of te students in ACS and MGS absented themselves during the day in order to attend the meetings. All English and Chinese Bibles were sold out and fresh supplies have to be ordered from kuala Lumur. Singapore town was in an uproar during those weeks. Everywhere people spoke of the meetings. In all, 1300 people accepted Jesus Christ as Saviour.” (p.173) Between 1933 and 1936, over 100,000 Chinese was converted to Jesus Christ through his ministry. In 1935 alone, over 5000 Chinese in this region were converted to Christ.

There should be consistent Bible study, so that Christians can come to a deeper and more personal understanding of God’s Word. Through God’s revealed Word, we can get to know God better and learn more about His will for them. As 2 Tim 2:15 reminds us, “Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.” (ESV)

In my bible study, for Chinese Bible, I use both the New Chinese Version (新译本, from The Worldwide Bible Society) and Chinese Union Version. For English, I use the ESV (Crossway) & NASB (1995) for daily reading. To compare translations & help in understanding, I check up NIV, NRSV, NKJV, and NLT. Having a parallel bible can be useful, but it's heavy & expensive. So, I buy personal size bible of different versions instead! Easier to carry around too!

4) Gospel- Not Diluted nor changed

As we obey Jesus’ command to us to proclaim the Gospel, the Gospel we proclaim should be what is revealed in the Holy Scripture, God’s Word to us (the canonical OT & NT). When the gospel is preached, it should be centered in the preaching “Jesus Christ, and Him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2). The Penal-substitutionary nature of Christ’s atonement should be taught. Christians sometimes forget that we depend on Christ's death on the cross for our salvation. The ‘disappearance’ of Christ from Roman Catholics’ crucifix, during the Reformation of the 1500s, tells us that Christ has risen. He is risen for our sake. If Christ is not raised, what we are preaching would be in vain. If we do not believe Christ has risen, what we believe would be in vain. Christianity is not a religion, it is a historical fact.

Paul’s words “and also for me, that words may be given to me in opening my mouth boldly to proclaim the mystery of the gospel” (Ephesians 6:19, ESV) is what we urgently need.

5) Evangelism: The Biblical “witness”/ Be a Witness

The task of evangelism and disciple-making should be the primary and urgent task of our church. However, as a witness to Christ, there is no need to denigrate other religions. We should live in harmony with those of other faiths (though not obliterating the biblical teaching to keep our worship of God separate from these faiths).

Evangelism is telling others about the gospel, or to put it more plainly it’s about telling others about Jesus. But, do we really know what the gospel message involves? Too often, the latter (“telling others about Jesus”) often translates into “telling others about ourselves”! We simply talk about their ‘changed’ lives. We start recounting how Christianity has impacted our own lives. This is an underestimation of the power of the gospel! We try to add our side of the story. It is as though if we do not give our personal testimony, our non-Christian friend would not be lead to Christ!

However, there is a difference between our own testimony (personal experience) about our journey to faith and the Biblical “witness” to Jesus Christ. We shouldn’t replace the biblical testimony with our personal testimony. The content of evangelism should be the Biblical witness to Christ and God, not our journey to faith. Will Metzger in his very helpful book, Tell the Truth (IVP), says that, “the content [of the Biblical witness] is Christ and God, not our journey to faith. Our personal testimony may be included, but witnessing is more than reciting our spiritual autobiography. Specific truths about a specific person are the subject of our proclamation. A message has been committed to us—a word of reconciliation to the world (2 Corinthians 5:19).”(p. 24)

Before we are to be able to explain to non-Christians the biblical witness to Christ, we need to know our Biblical facts well. Before we start telling people the truth in love, we need to know what does it means to “tell people the truth”? To understand “the truth”, we need to be very clear about who Jesus is and understand something of the nature of his saving work. This is where theology comes in. The doctrine of God tells us the character of God (His attributes), the Trinity, and the Creation of the Universe. The doctrine of Man focuses on the creation of Man, it tells us why God create us, how did God make us like himself, and what does the scripture mean by “soul” and “spirit”. It also explains what is sin, and where did it come from. The doctrine of Christ explains the atonement. Was it necessary for Christ to die? What really happened in the atonement? What was the significance of Christ’s resurrection and ascension? What happened to Christ when he ascended into heaven?

The gospel is the saving work of Christ as summarized in 1 Corinthians 15:1-8, together with the gospel imperative to repent and believe. 1 Corinthians 15:1-8 (ESV) reads:

v1) Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you stand, v2)and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain. v3) For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, v4) that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, v5) and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. V6) Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. v7) Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. v8) Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. v9) For I am the least of the apostles, unworthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. v10) But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain. On the contrary, I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me. v11) Whether then it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed.

v12) Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? v13) But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. v14) And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. 15We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised.

With these basic presuppositions about God, creation, man, sin and salvation, we are then ready to engage in evangelism! These constitute the “truth” we must tell non-Christians in love. Through this message, God’s creates faith and enables sinners to believe.

D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones (in his The Presentation of the Gospel), reminds us that the supreme object of the work of evangelism is to glorify God. This brings us correctly back to the top on our list of “Response & Responsibility”, which is to give Glory to God.

6) The Church- A Witnessing Body

May we be reminded that the physical building we use for worship is not an end in itself. It should serve to remind us of our spiritual calling to be united in truth and holiness, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God. If the building does not help us to be spiritually-minded, then it is a curse rather than a blessing to us. It is the spiritually-minded people that form the church, and not the bricks and cement. May that message serve our church well till the Lord's return.

In Ephesians, Paul reminds us that the church is not an institution, but a living organism of which all believers are members, and Christ is the head. Because the church is more than an association or an institution, believers must learn to out a life which reflect us being the body of Christ. When describing the Presbyterian missionary work in the 1880s to early 1900s period, Bobby Sng wrote that the reason why many were ready to accept the gospel was that the immigrant population “discovered in the churches compassion and practical help they needed so badly” (p. 102). [In His Good Time: The Story of the Church in Singapore 1819-2002 (Third Edition). Singapore: Bible Society of Singapore/ Graduates’ Christian Fellowship, 1980, 1993, 2003.] As Singaporeans become affluent, are we still able to show compassion towards one another. Are we still able to accept the differences (be it character, or socio-economic, racial) of others?

“be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might” (Ephesians 6:10, ESV)



Thursday, June 22, 2006

A Prayer of Ulrich Zwingli

Almighty, eternal and merciful God, whose Word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path, open and illuminate our minds, that we may purely and perfectly understand thy Word and that our lives may be conformed to what we have rightly understood, that in nothing we may be displeasing unto thy majesty, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
(Timothy George, Theology of the Reformers (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1988), p. 129)

A Prayer of Martin Luther

Beyond, Lord, an empty vessel that needs to be filled.
My Lord, fill it.
I am weak in the faith; strengthen thou me.
I am cold in love; warm me and make me fervent that my love may go out to my neighbour.
I do not have a strong and firm faith; at times I doubt and am unable to trust thee altogether.
O Lord, help me. Strengthen my faith and trust in thee.
In thee I have sealed the treasures of all I have.
I am poor; thou art rich and didst come to be merciful to the poor.
I am a sinner; thou art upright.
With me there is an abundance of sin; in thee is the fullness of righteousness.
Therefore, I will remain with thee of whom I can receive but to whom I may not give.
Amen.
(Clyde Manschreck, ed., Prayers of the Reformers (Philadelphia: Muhlenberg Press, 1958), p. 79.)

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

The Earliest Church in Singapore

The Armenian Christians & CatholicsI was traveling along Victoria St a few days back. I saw a banner which says that the Cathedral of the Good Shepherd (Catholic) (founded 1832), will be celebrating its 160th Anniversary (1846-2006) on Corpus Christi this year (18 June 2006). Wah …, that’s a long history, considering that Raffles only came to Singapore in 1819. Singapore is only 187 years old (1819-2006). But, the Catholics were not the first to start a church here. About 2 years after Raffles arrival, the first church in Singapore was founded. It is the Armenian Street of St. Gregory the Illuminator, located along Hill Street, which is just a few hundred meters away from the Cathedral of the Good Shepherd (Catholic). The Armenian Church is Singapore's first and oldest church. In 1821, the Armenian community was already having regular religious services in rented rooms in Commercial Square (present day Raffles Place). The building we see today was completed in 1835. It was built by colonial architect George Drumgoole Coleman. It is named Armenian Church of St. Gregory the Illuminator because the church was dedicated to St. Gregory the Illuminator, the first monk of the Armenian Church. The total cost of the building is recorded as 5,058.30 Spanish Dollars.

The Anglican Church

Straight cross Victoria Street, next to City Hall MRT, we have the first Anglican Church in Singapore, St Andrew’s Cathedral. The emergence of the Church of England has a rich and colourful history relating to King Henry VIII. For local Anglicans, they (St Andrew Cathedral) celebrated its 150th Anniversary Service of St Andrew’s church mission on June 4, 2006. St Andrew’s Cathedral was birthed on Pentecost Sunday in 1856. On 25 June 1856, the St Andrew’s Church Mission was organized. St Andrew’s Church (now a cathedral) was consecrated in 1838. In 1872, Rev. Gomes arrived in 1872 and was appointed superintendent of the St Andrew’s Church Mission. He was able to preach in Tamil, Malay ad Hokkien! Between 1872 and 1890, the mission had a total of 356 baptisms (Sng, p. 75). Rev. Gomes died in 2 March 1902 at the full age of 75 years. According to Bobby Sng, “In spite of failing health in his later years, he carried on his ministry right to the end”(p. 75). Today, the Anglican Church has some 40 congregations in 26 parishes, with an estimated membership of about 25 000. The parishes include All Saints Church, Chapel of Christ the King, Chapel of the Resurrection, Christ Church, Church of Our Saviour, Church of the Ascension, Church of the Epiphany, Church of the Good Shepherd, Church of the True Light, Holy Trinity Church, Light of Christ City Church, Marine Parade Christian Centre, St George’s Church, St Jame’s Church, St John’s-St Margaret’s Church, and St Matthew’s Church. Since the formation of the Province of the Anglican Church in South East Asia (a grouping of the diocese of Kuching, Sabah, Singapore & West Malaysia), its current bishop Rt Rev John Chewis also the 3rd Anglican Archbishop of the Province.

The Presbyterian Church

Interestingly, another church nearby (about 3 bus stops away), the Orchard Road Presbyterian Church (ORPC) was also founded in 1856. Thus, 1856 saw the inauguration of both the Presbyterian and the Anglican Mission. Today, ORPC has four different language congregations (English, Mandarin, German, and Indonesian). ORPC is also celebrating its 150th Anniversary this year.

150 years may be long, but ORPC is not the oldest church in Singapore. At Prinsep Street Presbyterian Church (PSPC), we see God’s 163 Years of Faithfulness (1843-2006)! With 163 years of history, PSPC is the oldest existing Protestant church in Singapore. PSPC was originally a Malay chapel for local Malay-speaking Chinese. It was started by former LMS missionary Benjamin Keasberry in 1843. [Keasberry was born of British parents in India in 1811. He was conversant with the Malay language. When the LMS left Singapore, Keasberry resigned from the LMS as they wanted to remain so as to continue with their work among the Malays. He believed his main minstry was to the Malays. … but we know that he did church planting work among two ethnic groups - the Chinese and the Malays. Keasberry translated the New Testament into Romanised Malay and published it in 1853. This was followed 3 years later by an Arabic text. According to Bobby Sng in his In His Good Time, “Keasberry also compiled a Malay hymnal which remained as the standard hymnal for Malay speaking Christians for many decades” (p. 53). Keasberry also wrote numerous tracts. All these are in addition to his weakly Sunday preaching schedule, managing a printing-press and conducting a boarding school. …. This is sure hard work!! …. And for 38 year, he did all these! … … and we mustn’t forget that Keasberry “had a weak heart and was warned often to reduce his load of work” (Sng, p. 54). Isn’t this very much similar to Rev. Gomes (of the St Andrew’s Church Mission) who carried on his ministry right to the end of his life? Their pioneering ministry provided the springboard for the subsequent development of both the Anglican and Presbyterian Church in Singapore. According to the Department of Statistics 2001, 99.6% of Malays follow Islam. Of the remaining 0.4%, some are definitely Christians, and I believe the efforts of Keasberry remain today! 0.4% may seem small, but we must keep in mind that the “the very nature of lslamic dctrines and the close affinity of the Malays to their religion, posed formidable obstacles to their conversion to any other religion” (Sng, p. 55).] At its opening service, over 60 Malays and others attended. In a way, we can say that the Malay chapel is the forerunner of Presbyterian Churches. According to In His Good Time (Third Edition), Bobby Sng tells us that “[i]n its 20 years of existence, there were only 82 baptisms” and “a number backslided later from the faith” (p. 100). So, in Oct 1879, help was sought from the ORPC to supervise it. For PSPC, according to the website, it has “a rich heritage with members whose families go back many generations”. PSPC has also planted Adam Road Presbyterian Church (ARPC).

Diagonally across PSPC, we have another century-old Presbyterian church, the Singapore Life Church (SLC). SLC is a member of the Presbyterian Church in Singapore. It is located along Prinsep Street and has a congregation of more than 700 people worshipping in 3 different services- Teochew/Mandarin, English and Mandarin respectively. The English service has a congregation of 125 and the remaining 651 to the Teochew/Mandarin and Mandarin services.

As early Singapore is also made up of a majority of Chinese dialect-speaking migrants, besides the English speaking churches, there are also numerous Chinese dialect-speaking churches, and the Glory Presbyterian Church (GPC) at Bt Timah is the oldest Chinese-speaking church in Singapore. GPC (which Rev. Keasberry helped to found) was initially a preaching station and Bt Timah was still a village then. The success of the Chinese Presbytery of the present-day Presbyterian Church can be traced back to the work of Rev. J. A. B. Cook of the English Presbyterian Mission, whose “intent was to work among the Chinese abroad” and “heart was in foreign mission work among those who had never heard the gospel” (p.100). Rev. Cook first went to Swatow in China to learn the Teochew dialect. In 1882, “Cook’s first responsibility was to take charge of the congregation at Bt Timah, by which then had fallen to just 39 members” (Sng, p. 101). He undertook corrective measures to tackle problems, one of which is the unwillingness to set aside Sunday as a day of worship. From this congregation at Bt Timah, the present Bethel Church (at Jalan Lateh), Singapore Life Church (SLC) and the Jubilee Church was born.

In 1883, SLC was founded. It was started by group of members who rented a room at Prinsep Street. In 1885, this group moved to Keasberry’s Malay Chapel [our present-day PSPC]. At the Prinsep Street Presbyterian Chapel, Sunday services were combined with a Baptist church as there were not many members then. For a few decades, it shared the same premises with the PSPC. To me, this is an amazing display of cooperation and unity in Christ. Seldom seen today….! On 15 June 1901, the 1st Singapore Presbyterian Church (SPC) Conference was held at Life Church then known as "Teck Khak". In 4 Jan 1917, the land at 142-144 Prinsep Street (the site we are at today) was purchased and rented out. In 3 Oct 1928, Teck Khak began the construction of it's new building. Rev John Williams was invited to hold the ceremony and SPC sent relatives, Tan Lin Tian and Liauw Tian Yak to attend. In Spring 1929, Tek Khak invited Rev Kwok Jing Hoon and SPC representatives to participate in the ceremony celebrating the completion of the new church building and Pastors' building. The church was renamed "Say Mia Tng Teck Khak". The church's goal was to promote bible knowledge and Christianity. … … so what happened to the Teochew-speaking Baptists who had worshipped at this Tekka Church (our present Singapore Life Church)? They (30 of them) left Tekka Church to form the Oversea-Chinese (Swatow) Baptist Church of Singapore.

During World War II, Singapore was conquered and all Western preachers were captured. Under the Japanese occupancy, work of churches were mostly regulated. God was gracious to Life Church (SLC) as daily business, e.g., Sunday Worship and Outreach Ministry were allowed to run as per normal. Hey, this is what I call amazing grace.

After WWII, in Oct 1950, SLC’s English Worship was set up. The worship service met from 5.00 pm to 7.00 pm on Sunday. The official number of members attending was more than a 100. It was then held at the Main Sanctuary of the church. On 18 Aug 1955, The members of Life Church separated into 3 congregations, namely, "Teck Khak", "Newton" and "English Service". Members voted to decide which church they belonged and the results were 332, 107 and 129 respectively. In June 1956, the church rented a piece of land at Changi 10 Mile Stone to build an outreach center called Changi Outreach Station. In Jan 1959, English Life Church purchased land in Newton to build a church which was completed on Oct 1960. They shifted into the new premises from Life Church on the 3rd Sunday of October 1960 and celebrated her 10th Thanksgiving Anniversary. She was then named "Singapore Christian Bible Presbyterian Life Church". In 19 Jan 1969, SLC decided to rebuild the church. The old building was over 40 years old and the roof was leaking and was infected with termites. Moreover, the existing space was not sufficient to meet the rising demand of the various departments. So, in 10 March 1974, the old church building was demolished. In 21 April 1974, a ceremony was held on Easter Sunday to commemorate the beginning of the church building project. In 26 Dec 1975, t he Registrar of Society approved the Chinese and English church name. The initial Roman pronunciation of "Say Mia Tng Teck Khak" (you would not be able to pronounce this if you do not know the Chinese dialect Teochew) given in 1929 was told to change to English by the order of Registrar of Society in 1975. Session decided to rename it to "Singapore Life Church".

On 29 May 1977, a Thanksgiving Service was conducted by Rev Paul Hsiu (The Presbyterian Synod's Moderator) to commemorate the completion of the new building. In 1983, SLC (then called Life Church) celebrated her 100th year anniversary. In Sept 1983, (04 Sept-09 Sept), a spiritual renewal cum gospel rally was held in Life Church. The first 3 nights were for spiritual revival meetings and the last for gospel rally. Rev Dr Maak Hay Chun was invited as speaker for this event. (Source: http://www.antioch.com.sg/sg/slc/history.htm)

However, as early Singapore is also made up of a majority of Chinese dialect-speaking migrants, besides the English speaking churches, there are also numerous Chinese dialect-speaking churches. For example, Jubilee Church (1883- ), was at first an endeavor of the Rev. J. A. B. Cook of the English Presbyterian Mission. According to the Church’s website:

He came to Singapore in 1881 after learning the Teochew dialect in China (in the region called “Swatow”). He immediately took charge of the congregation at Bukit Timah (later known as the Glory Presbyterian Church) which was set up by Benjamin P. Keasberry of the London Missionary Society and Tan See Boo in 1857. As the church grew, the congregation decided to plant new churches since some church members lived too far from the church. One of the extending groups, the Hokkien-speaking group started meeting at Hong Lim market. The year was 1883 and Singapore was an immigrant society under British rule. The church later gathered in the Eastern School in Ansiang Hill, and by 1898, it had installed its first Chinese moderator, the Rev. Tay Sek Tin.

The first church building was built in Tanjong Pagar in 1904 and was completed in 1905; it was named the Tanjong Pagar Church. As the congregation grew, the church again erected a new building in Outram Road in 1939. It then adopted the name Outram Road Tanjong Pagar Church. Meanwhile, some Tanjong Pagar residents still worshipped in the old building. In January 1946 the name “Jubilee Church” was officially introduced in conjunction with the forthcoming fiftieth anniversary (1954) and to celebrate the end of the Japanese occupation.

As a denomination, the Presbyterian Church in Singapore celebrated its 125th Anniversary this year. Its theme for its anniversary celebration is “Growing in Christ, Embracing the Future”. Organized as a Synod with 2 Presbytery (English and Chinese), the Presbyterian Church in Singapore currently has 40 churches with about 16000 members. The Presbyterian Church sees the need to “take stock of its Reformed Traditions and beliefs”.

Reformed Christians have a bad reputation for not being concerned about evangelism. However, as I look at the history of the Presbyterian Church in Singapore, who says the Presbyterian, with its understanding of Reformed Theology, is not concerned with mission or evangelism? In the book In His Good Time: The Story of the Church in Singapore 1819-2002 (Third Edition) [Singapore: Bible Society of Singapore/ Graduates’ Christian Fellowship, 1980,1993, 2003] Bobby Sng tells us that one of the reasons for the steady growth of the Presbyterian churches in Singapore between the 1880s and early 1900 was that the “Presbyterian churches had always placed great emphasis on evangelism” (p. 102).

A correct understanding of the Calvinistic/ Reformed Theology would not allow so-called ‘limited atonement’ to hinder evangelism and missionary efforts.

The Methodist Church

Of course, one shouldn't forget the Methodist (of which I am one [Calvinistic Methodist]) either. While the Methodists [America Methodist Episcopal Church] went to Foochow in 1847, and the Presbyterians [English Presbyterian Mission] only entered China [Amoy] in 1848, the Methodists arrived in Singapore later the Presbyterians. The Methodist Church in Singapore (MCS) celebrated its 120th Anniversary in 2005 (1885-2005). Its first church is Wesley Methodist Church (120 years). The second oldest Methodist Church in Singapore, is Tamil Methodist Church at Short Street. It celebrated its 118th Anniversary on Sept 25, 2005.As I was searching the web and found this, this came as a surprise to me. I never knew there was such an old Tamil church in Singapore. The third oldest Methodist Church in Singapore is a Chinese Methodist Church, the Telok Ayer Chinese Methodist Church at Telok Ayer Street. It celebrated its 116th Anniversary in 2005. The church building we see today at Telok Ayer Street is 80 years old. Foochow Methodist Church came into existence in mid-December 1897. As such, Foochow Methodist Church is the second oldest church in the Chinese Annual Conference (CAC). CAC’s Geylang Methodist Church is 100 years old (1905-2005), while TRAC’s Paya Lebar Methodist Church is 74 years ago.

The Methodist Church was founded by Anglo-American Methodist missionaries from India, William Oldham and James Thoburn. According to the MCS's website,

The MCS derives its beginnings from a missionary initiative of the South India Conference led by Dr James Thoburn (Missionary Bishop of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Southern Asia) in 1885. Its early foundations were laid by the Rev Wiliam F Oldham, who established the Mission and its first English language boys' school in 1886.Together with two girls' schools begun in 1887 and 1888, the Mission developed linguistic ministries in nearly all the local vernaculars,a medical clinic, and school hostels for foreign boys and homeless girls.

Thereafter, the Mission rapidly spread to the main towns of the Malayan Peninsula and Sarawak, where churches and schools that were twinned with them provided a base for missionary outreach in English and the vernacular languages. Like most other missions, the Methodist Mission in Singapore and Malaya expanded and matured - first becoming a Conference, then Conferences spanning South-east Asia, and the establishment of the South-east Asian Central Conference in 1950.

The Malaysian and Singapore components became autonomous in 1968, and thus became an Asian church with a bishop that was elected from amongst its ministers. In 1976, the process was repeated when it was restructured into The Methodist Church in Singapore,and Malaysia, respectively.

The Methodist Church in Singapore is currently made up of a General Conference (meet once every four years) and 3 Annual Conferences: Chinese Annual Conference (CAC), Emmanuel Tamil Annual Conference (ETAC) and Trinity Annual Conference (TRAC). TRAC, CAC, ETAC has a total of 42 churches, with a membership of more than 32,000. The MCS represent one of the largest Protestant denominations and cater to all the languages used in the Republic: the vernaculars like Hokkien, Foochow, Hakka, Hinghwa,Teochew and Cantonese, as well as Malay, Mandarin, Tamil and English, which is the language of choice. With Chinese (including its dialect) speaking, English Speaking and Tamil speaking congregations, the MCS reflects Singapore's multiple ethnic groups.

The MCS is Episcopal in its church polity. It is headed by Bishop Dr Robert Solomon (previously principal of Trinity Theological College, Singapore), who is elected at its General Conference. Each of the Annual Conferences is headed by a President.

The 16th World Methodist Conference was convened at the Westin Stamford (Singapore) from July 24 to 31, 1991.

(Further Reading: Robbie B H Goh, Sparks of Grace: The Story of Methodism in Asia. Singapore: The Methodist Church in Singapore, Dec 2003. 209 pages. $13. Associate Professor Robbie B H Goh is Deputy Head of the Department of English Language and Literature, National University of Signapore. He is also a member of Cairnhill Methodist Church. This book chronicles the work of the Methodist Church in Asia. It tell the “Methodist Story” in a country by country format of the Asian countries Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, The Philippines, Indonesian, Indonesia, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Taiwan. We see how missionaries planted churches, how people spread their faith despite the social and political challenge.)


Mission schools

The Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Methodists, and Presbyterians set up mission schools. They are also concerned with imparting moral values to the young and instilling in them the love for God.

The Roman Catholics built schools, such as Assumption English School (1953), Assumption Vocational Institute , Canossa Convent Primary School (1947) , the CHIJ schools (Canossa Convent Primary School (1947), Bukit Timah (Primary) (1955), Katong (Primary) (1959), Kellock Primary (1964), St Joseph's Convent (1938), Our Lady of the Nativity (1957)), St Joseph's Institution (1852), & St Patrick's School (1933).

The Anglicans have the St Andrew schools (Junior, Secondary & JC), St Hilda’s & St Margret School. The Methodists have the ACS schools (Junior, Secondary [Barker], Independent [Dover] & JC), Fairfield Methodist School (Primary & Secondary) and MGS, etc.. The Methodist schools represent the major educational trust of the MCS. There are 13 primary and secondary schools and a junior college. For more than a century, they have helped to play an important role in the human resource development of Singapore. The Presbyterians have ………..

As Bobby Sng in his In His Good Time remind us, the question to ask is this: “What is the church’s primary objective in promoting education? Is it an end itself, or does it serves as a means to fulfill the church’s evangelistic mandate?”(p.150). For me, I think it serve both purposes (though I see the latter as more important than the former) and they do not contradict each other. But, does the bible mention anything about mission schools? Is setting up of mission schools biblical? What about the problem of proselytization?

In an article entitled “Evangelism—Our Supreme Need”, I think Rev. Goh Hoon Keng’s comment when he examined the educational policy of the Methodist mission is also useful to our understanding on the role of mission schools in evangelism: “Our business is not merely to educate, we have a far greater and bigger task to perform. Our supreme task is, by God’s help, to get the thousands of young people in our schools and boarding schools into a vital relationship and contact with God through Jesus Christ, so that they may be men and women of solid, sterling character, who will go out and fill their places in the world, and be a blessing to mankind and a glory to God. In so far as we succeed in achieving this end, is the educational policy of the mission justified” (Wong Hoon Hee (ed.), Memoirs of the Late Rev. Goh Hoon Keng (Singapore), p.99. cited in Sng, p. 152.).

Though mission schools may be a means to fulfill the church’s evangelistic mandate, we should neither forget nor neglect the need for direct evangelism. I think the bible’s teaching is still on the power of the gospel unto salvation for those who hears it. The Catholics in Singapore have more schools than the Protestants, but I don’t think their percentage increase in numbers is not more than the Protestants.


20th Century Church Growth

Western missionary impulse and initiative led to the founding of several more denominational churches. The Seventh-day Adventists (I do not consider it a Christian church!) came in 1908. The Assemblies of God (1933), Salvation Army (1935), Southern Baptists (1950), United Lutheran Church of America (1952), and Church of Christ (1956).

The Assemblies of God

The Assembly of God Churches include Berean Assembly of God, Bethany Christian Centre, Bethel Assembly of God Church, Calvary Assembly of God Church, Emmanuel Assembly of God, Elim Church Assembly of God, Eternal Life Assembly, Evangel Assembly of God, Faith Assembly of God Church, Grace Assembly of God Church, Harvester Assembly of God Church, Herald Assembly of God Church, Living Spring Fellowship, New Life Church, Smyrna Assembly, The Harvester Force, Trinity Christian Centre, and Victory Family Centre.

Baptist Churches- Southern Baptists (1950)

In the outlining of the history of the Presbyterian Church in Sinagpore, I noted that for a period of time, Teochew-speaking Baptists worshipped together with the Teochew-speaking Presbyterians at the Tekka Church (our present Singapore Life Church). The Sunday services were combined as both parties do not have many members then. For the Teochew-speaking Baptists, their lack of effective leadership prevented them with organizing themselves into a church. To me, I think God sometimes use our lack of resources to unite us together. When we have too much resources, we think of spliting!! One should also not forget that TTC was also “birthed” in the prisons of Changi, during times of great desperation and anguish.

In 1937, these Teochew-speaking Baptists (30 of them) left Tekka Church to form the Oversea-Chinese (Swatow) Baptist Church of Singapore. In 1955, the church moved and came to be known as the Thomson Rd Baptist Church. In 1949, the Kay Poh Baptist Church, then known as the Oversea-Chinese (Cantonese) Baptist Church of Singapore, was formed.

The Baptist Churches in Singapore include Abundant Life Baptist Church, Acts Baptist Church, Agape Baptist Church, Community of Praise Baptist Church, Covenant Community Baptist Church, Calvary Baptist Church, Life Baptist Church, Faith Community Baptist Church, Gospel Baptist Church, Grace Baptist Church, Kay Poh Baptist Church, International Baptist Church, Leng Kwang Baptist Church, Maranatha Baptist Church, New Life Baptist Church, Queenstown Baptist Church, Redeemer Baptist Church.


The Lutheran Church in Singapore

Of the 4 denominations, the Lutherans only came in the late 1950s. In the late 1950s, Lutheran missionaries from America started work that led to the formation of the Lutheran Church in Malaysia and Singapore. However, since the early 1900s, there have been Lutheran Christians in Singapore and Malaya. They were members of the Tamil Evangelical Lutheran Church (TELC). In August 1996, the Lutheran Church in Singapore (LCS) was gazetted as an independent national church. Its doctrinal statement is(http://www.lutheran.org.sg/background.htm):


We confess Jesus Christ as Lord of the Church and acknowledge the Holy Scriptures as the norm for faith and life. We believe in the scriptural principle of the priesthood of all believers. As such, we encourage all our members to participate in the various works of the Church, through local congregations and central committees. The main objectives of the Lutheran Church in Singapore are:

· To proclaim the Gospel to all people in Singapore
· To participate in world wide mission
· To gather into fellowship & nurture those believers who respond in faith to the Gospel

The Lutheran Church of Our Redeemer (LCOR) ) (at Duke’s Rd) is the first Lutheran Church in Singapore. It has a unique history in establishing a multi-racial, multi-lingual, multi-ethnic Church in Singapore. It was formed when the Tamils, Bataks, Chinese and Europeans came together to form the first Lutheran Church in Singapore. These groups brought with them rich cultural backgrounds, which enable one to learn and respect the other in the family of God.

The Lutheran Conference transpired from the efforts of Dr Anspach, an American Lutheran missionary working in Malaya. This comprised of representatives from the various Lutheran groups in Malaya (TELC, HKBP and United Lutheran Church Mission). The LCOR was a project from the Lutheran Conference. All the groups expressed a desire for inter-Lutheran co-operation and Singapore was chosen as the natural place for this type of co-operation to begin.

The conference saw a bright future for the growth of a Lutheran Church with the presence of Tamil Lutherans and HKBP members in Singapore. The three groups could share the land and building. On 6 March 1960, pastor John R. Nelson, then President of the Lutheran Conference, dedicated the Church. The name chosen for the Church, The Lutheran Church of Our Redeemer signifies the common faith in Christ who redeems our differences so as to make people free to serve the Lord and fulfil His mission on earth. (source: http://www.lcor.org.sg/oldsite/aboutus.html)

The Bishop of the Lutheran Church in Singapore is Rev John Tan. The Lutherans currently worshipped at several locations in Singapore, namely the Bedok Lutheran Church, Jurong Christian Church, Lutheran Church Of Our Redeemer, Mas Kuning Lutheran Church, Queenstown Lutheran Church, Yishun Christian Church (Lutheran), and the Thai Good News Center (http://www.lutheran.org.sg/worship.htm).

The Brethen Church

In the list of local churches with a history of more than 100 years, there is also the Brethen Church. The origin of the Brethren churches in Singapore is the Plymouth Brethren (also called the Open Brethren. They are also those who brought us dispensationalism), not the German Brethren (the Anabaptists). These two groups are not related to each other. The German Brethren movement was founded by Alexander Mack (1679-1735) and seven other German believers in Schwarzenau, Germany, in 1708], which celebrated its 140th years of “Bethesda legacy” a few years back (I think it is 2004). The first Christian Brethren congregation was formed by the English merchant Philip Robinson in 1864. From the history of the Brethen Church in Singapore, we can see that God do not only work through missionary agencies. The bible tell us that people can bring the gospel with them wherever they went and found churches (see the example of the Antioch church in Acts 11:19). In 1857, Philip Robinson (born in England but migrated to Australia when he was 19) came to Sinagpore and found employment as an assistant in a commercial firm. One of Singaporean’s favourite shopping outlet Robinson, was founded by Philip Robinson. Philip Robinson’s brethren upbringing led him to start the Brethen movement in Sinagpore in 1864. On 3 July 1864, the first Brethen Service was started in a rented room at 108 Bencoolen Street! On Sept 1866, a new meeting place with a seating capacity of 60 (which later increased to 150 through the addition of an extension) was built at 77 Bras Basah Rd. It was known as the Bethsda Chapel [which later become known as the Bethsda Gospel Hall]. The Chinese Gospel Hall was formed when See Boo and Rev. A. Grant left the Presbyterian mission to join the Brethren. Both of them were fluent in Hokkien. (both belonged to the Presbyterian mission! Rev. W. Jeffrey also resigned to join the Brethen!)

The Brethren believed that baptism must only be for believers and to be carried out by immersion. They believed that as an infant is unable to make a choice to receive Christ into his life, there is therefore no place for infant baptism. Only those who have conscientiously repented of their sins and have placed their trust in Jesus Christ are to be baptized by immersion. This mode is preferred for its parallel imagery to the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This is in contrast to the Presbyterians and Methodists who practice infant baptism and allow baptism either by sprinkling and immersion. As the Brethren see all Christians equal before God, they do not have ordained priests and pastors. This is in contrast to the Presbyterians Methodists who have pastors, and the Anglicans and Methodists who are Episcopal in church polity. The Brethren are committed to missionary work and hold that the Holy Bible is the first authority in matters of faith. AS they believe the revealed and inspired Word of God is a sufficient rule not only for faith but practice, they have framed no written creed. Each assembly (or congregation) is independent of the others in both doctrinal matters and church administration (have their own body of elders and deacons), and yet, in practice, there is a high degree of communication and cooperation between them.

The Brethen Churches, or called the Bethsda Church (Gospel Hall), can be found at Bedok-Tampines, Frankel Estate, Bukit Arang, Ang Mo Kio, Katong, Serangoon, and Bukit Panjang.

After World War Two

Besides Western missionary effort, Asian Christians set up Syrian Christian and Chinese Baptist Churches in the 1930s. After WWII, several largely indigenous denominations were founded: the Bible-Presbyterian Church (1950), the Bible Church (1958), and Christian Nationals’ Evangelism Commission (1960).

The Bible-Presbyterian Church (1950)

The Bible-Presbyterian churches in Singapore includes Bethlehem Bible-Presbyterian Church, Calvary Bible-Presbyterian Church, Cana Bible-Presbyterian Church, Eden Bible-Presbyterian Church, Faith Bible-Presbyterian Church, Galilee Bible-Presbyterian Church, Gethsemane Bible-Presbyterian Church, Grace Bible-Presbyterian Church, Hebron Bible-Presbyterian Church, Life Bible-Presbyterian Church, Maranatha Bible-Presbyterian Church, Mount Carmel Bible-Presbyterian Church, Mount Hermon Bible-Presbyterian Church, Nazareth Bible-Presbyterian Church, New Life Bible-Presbyterian Church and Sembawang Bible-Presbyterian Church, Shalom Bible-Presbyterian Church, Sharon Bible-Presbyterian Church, and Zion Bible-Presbyterian Church.

The Bible-Presbyterian church has seven roots. Here I describe six of the more important ones.

1) French: John Calvin (the 16th Century Reformation) who wrote Institutes of the Christian Religion.
[..... ... .... to be updated!!]

Christian Nationals’ Evangelism Commission (CNEC) (1960)

The CNEC was formed during WWII through the joint efforts of three American businessmen and Dr. N.A. Kepson. These people knew that “the days of Western missionary efforts were probably drawing to a close and that Chinese nationals themselves must be involved with in reaching their own people” (p.212).

The Evangelical Reformed Churches in Singapore (ERCS)

The Evangelical Reformed Churches in Singapore (ERCS) was first established in 1982, though its early years in Singapore can be traced back as early as 1962 by a teacher in a government school (the Monks' Hill Secondary School) by the name of Goh Seng Fong. (Rev. Goh later went on to establish a Baptist church, known as the Emmanuel Baptist Church instead!)The ERCS is in the Dutch Reformed Tradition and uphold the Reformed Standard of the Three Forms of Unity, which comprise the Heidelberg Catechism, the Belgic Confession, and the Canons of Dort. (See http://www.prca.org/singapore.html for a write-up by Pastor Lau Chin Kwee of the history of the ERCS’s history)

As in the history of the various denominations, other denominations’ is inevitably found. For the ERCS, in its early years, we see also early Baptistic influence. We see the Bible-Presbyterian (B-P) Church’s presence. Their pastors were trained at the Far Eastern Bible College (FEBC). The Protestant Reformed Churches (PRC) in the US rendered help to Gospel Literature and Tract Society (GLTD, ERCS) when it sought help from PRC.

For the ERCS, the Lord's Providence of Church Premises was seen. The Lord was also gracious in providing their two churches with their own church premises. This is indeed a marvel as the two ERCS’s churches has only a combined membership of some 300, and this is within 12 years since the institution of the first Reformed church.

The Pentecostals and Charismatics

1) Faith Community Baptist Church (FCBC)

FCBC was established by Rev Lawrence Khong in 1986. In 1988, it became a cell group church. According to the church’s website (http://www.fcbc.org.sg/fcbc_milestones.asp), the Holy Spirit visited the church powerfully one Sunday in March 1990. The church became sensitive and moved in the things of the Spirit from then. In 1991, TOUCH Equipping Stations System (TESS), the comprehensive training programme was started to provide training for believers as well as pastoral staff. FCBC launched the 1st International Conference on Cell Group Churches (ICCGC). In 1992, FCBC's social welfare arm, TOUCH Community Services, was established to provide community-based services to strengthen the family and develop the individual. In 1993, TOUCHCENTRE, FCBC's first celebration centre with a seating capacity of 1,600 was opened. A year later, in 1994, FCBC had a greater challenge to take the cities for God through strategic-level spiritual warfare. In 1995, Vision 2001 was revealed to FCBC and churches in the Love Singapore movement to see the nation of Singapore know the love and lordship of Jesus. Having been a cell group church for 8 years, in 1996, FCBC mobilised 1,200 of its members into the mission fields for two weeks to model the cell life church in over ten countries. That year, it also celebrated its 10th year of existence and Senior Pastor Lawrence Khong led the first 40-day fast to build stronger relationships and have greater effectiveness in the ministry. In 1997, TOUCH Community Theatre was inaugurated as a second place of celebration, with a direct video link to TOUCHCENTRE. That year, we launched the Love Singapore Fund as the umbrella for churches in Singapore to help those affected by the Asian Economic Crisis. 1999 was a special year for FCBC. In that year, FCBC multiplied tremendously with a 79% increase in cells and some 3,000 conversions. FCBC also participated in the Carlos Annacondia Rally (I do not really agree with the teaching of Carlos Annacondia’s ministry), which witnessed an attendance of 100,000 and some 5,000 salvations and healings.

In the year 2000, FCBC’s Senior Pastor Lawrence Khong was commissioned as an Apostle by Dr Peter Wagner of the International Coalition of Apostles. (In the bible, I find that the office of Apostle is no longer available, but the role of Apostles is still functioning. As such, I do not believe that a pastor should be called an apostle. Though Dr Peter Wagner used to be a professor of theology at Fuller, I believe the bible is our final authority, and not man.) FCBC ventured into the media ministry to reclaim this industry for Jesus Christ. In 2001, FCBC was part of the LoveSingapore churches 7-Wave Harvest. Thousands came to know the Lord. Senior Pastor Lawrence Khong launched an evangelistic magic-musical, Magic of Love, which was attended by 40,000 people. In 2002, FCBC transitions into a Government of 12 (G12) cell church. The G12 movement, founded by Pastor Cesar Castellanos, is a strategy for winning the world through evangelism and discipleship. Senior Pastor Lawrence Khong was commissioned to be a member of Ps Cesar's International G12. In 2003, FCBC successfully transitioned itself into a full-fledged G12 cell church by meeting our target of 1,728 leaders each for our Men and Women networks. We witnessed 943 baptisms in our church services - the largest number in the history of FCBC in any one year. In 2005, FCBC baptized over 900 converts.

2) New Creation Church (NCC)

According to NCC’s website (http://www.newcreation.org.sg/aboutus/history/history.htm), the church had a humble beginning.New Creation Church was founded in 1984 when a small group of young believers in Singapore decided to gather together. Their vision was to start an independent, non-denominational church that is based solely on the unchanging Word of God. From an initial attendance of 25, the church gradually grew to about 150 members by 1990.In June 1990, Joseph Prince, a founding member and pioneer leader of the church, was appointed as the senior pastor. This marked a new beginning for New Creation Church. As Pastor Prince focused on Jesus Christ and His grace, God began to multiply the church. By 1998, the congregation numbered about 3,000.

NCC said that 1998 was the year the Gospel Revolution begins. In 1998, Pastor Prince received a commission from God to preach grace even more radically, without any dilution or compromises. Since then, Pastor Prince has been continually leading the church to rediscover the beauty of the gospel of grace. This gospel revolution led to even more phenomenal numerical growth. God multiplied the church to more than 12,000 members. The people began to experience breakthroughs in the area of finances. Miraculous healings of cancers, tumours, kidney conditions, Aids and much more took place. Testimonies of restored marriages and relationships, and transformed lives also began to pour in.
Even more precious are the countless testimonies of Christians who, set free by God’s grace, have rediscovered a fresh and vibrant love relationship with Jesus Christ our Lord.

Today, New Creation Church holds its services at the Rock Auditorium in Suntec City Mall. Every weekend, long queues would form outside the auditorium before each service. But the ministry of the church extends beyond the walls of the Rock Auditorium. Through the weekly broadcasts of the church services in Uganda, and the sermon CDs and DVDs distributed worldwide, many lives have been touched.

According to the church’s website, “as New Creation Church continues to increase and grow, it seeks to always remain true to its vision — to see Jesus in all the loveliness of His Person and the perfection of His work, and to make Him known through the preaching of the gospel in Singapore and worldwide”.

Evangelical Parachurch organisations

Alongside the churches, several new evangelical parachurch organizations started ministries among students in schools, colleges, and universities, notably the Inter-Varsity Fellowship (IVCF, 1952), Youth for Christ (YFC, 1957), Scripture Union’s Inter-School Christian Fellowship (1958), and Fellowship of Evangelical students (1959). The Graduates’ Christian Fellowship started its witness to professionals in 1955.

Scripture Union Singapore is an inter-denominational organization. It is registered as a society in 1961 and a charity in 1990. It is an autonomous national movement of Scripture Union International which began in Wales, England in 1867. (http://www.su.org.sg/Home/History.cfm )

Theological education

As for the theological education in Singapore, the two main theological college is Trinity theological college (TTC) and Singapore Bible College (SBC). Both are inter-denominational.

(a) The Trinity theological college (TTC)

The Trinity theological college (TTC) was founded at Mount Sophia with the initial support of the Methodist, Presbyterian, and Anglican Churches on 4 Oct 1948. TTC was started so that local men and women could be trained to serve the local church.

(b) Singapore Bible College (SBC)

With the China mainland closed to evangelistic efforts & missionary activities after 1949 (due to Mao Tse Tung’s Communism), the Chinese churches here which had previously depended upon China for their supply of pastors and other workers had their source cut off. According to Bobby Sng in his In His Good Time, a local Chinese Bible school was badly needed. Though the TTC was then already in existence, “the liberal theological position of the Western scholarship failed to inspire much confidence among the more conservative leaders of the Chinese churches” (p.213). In other words, many of the leaders of the Chinese churches then did not trust TTC due to its Western-dominance, more liberal Western leadership, and more liberal theology. There are two main reason for this: (1) Many of the Chinese pastors and Christians came from Fujian Province (& other southern provinces), where Reformed theology had been dominant, so the Chinese churches then were more conservative. (2) The influence of John Sung. His unhappy experience at Union Theological Seminary, where his Christian faith had almost been destroyed, caused him to detest liberal theology. Between 31 August and 15 September 1935, there was 40 meetings at Telok Ayer Methodist Church and all the meetings were packed.

With the cooperation of Rev. Guoh Kok Moh, Rev. Yap Kok Hu, Mr Lim Yao Chang and others (mainly from the Singapore Chinese Inter-Church Union), SBC (then known as the Singapore Theological Seminary) was established in 1952 with 8 students. In the initial stage, the Chinese Nationals’ Evangelism Commission (CNEC) supplied three lecturers and sufficient funds needed for the college. The Overseas Missionary Fellowship cooperated by loaning two couples as teachers. In 1958, the English department was opened. Later, it was renamed Singapore Bible College. “By 1975, 187 students had graduated and the majority was serving God in different parts of Southeast Asia, thus fulfilling the basic aim of CNEC to train nationals to reach their own people.” (Sng, p.213)

For SBC, there seem to be a stronger Presbyterian presence though. This may be due to the larger number of Chinese-speaking congregations in the Presbyterian Church in Singapore. It should be noted that last two moderators (Rev. Tan C.H. & Rev. Phua C.S.) of the local Presbyterian Church are from the Chinese Presbytery. SBC has its 53rd graduation ceremony on May 2006, so I think it should be about 55 years old. Besides these two “major” seminaries, there are also about 15 others seminaries, such as the East Asia School of Theology (EAST), Far Eastern Bible College (FEBC), BGST, etc. Thus, besides the more ‘mainline’ TTC, we also have several more conservative Bible colleges and seminaries.

Increasing Membership

Over the past hundred years, the both the RC and Protestant churches in Singapore experienced growth in membership. Several Charismatic and Pentecostal churches had significant numerical growth. But, Church membership does not equate to weekly worship attendance. Numerical growth does not equate to real converts! Church growth may not necessarily mean healthy church growth. Church growth is also not more important than church health.

For the established denominational church, may we not fall into dead formalism and unhealthy sectarianism. For the Charismatic and Pentecostal churches, may we not be deceived into believing that numerical growth means a healthy church. Increasingly, we heard of churches who say they want to be like the New Testament church of the bible. They want apostles, prophets, miracles and tongue speaking. However, they seem to have forgotten that the bible have many examples of New Testament churches. Not all are healthy and not all are Christ-like in all areas! May we not just strive for an external similarity, but also an internal Christ-likeness.

The Cost of Building a Church

When the first Armenian Church was built in Singapore in the 1830s, total cost of the building is recorded as 5,058.30 Spanish Dollars. This sounds cheap! …but this is more than 170 years ago! With inflation, a simple church building today in Singapore can easily cost more than 5 million dollars (and this is excluding land cost). Singapore’s most expensive church, the City Harvest Church, was built for $47.6 million (include land purchase and building construction)!

God's faithfulness

In the 19th Century, after the founding of Singapore by Raffles, Protestant and Catholic missions began work among the European residents and then the Asians. The earliest Protestant groups to arrive were the London Missionary Society (LMS), the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, and the Church Missionary Society.

As I look at God's faithfulness in the past 160+ years, we have both seen and experienced God's amazing grace. As the hymn reminds us….

Amazing grace! How sweet the sound That saved a wretch like me!I once was lost, but now am found;Was blind, but now I see. .... Through many dangers, toils and snares,I have already come;....