Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Talk on What is the Apocrypha?








What is the Apocrypha? The term "apocrypha" refers to a group of books that are not regarded as belonging to the canon of scripture, though many of them have been so regarded by the Roman Catholic Church and particular communities. The Protestant view is that they are valuable for understanding the events and culture of the inter-testamental period and for devotional reading. These books however were included in the original King James Version of 1611, as well as the Greek translation of the Old Testament known as "Septuagint."

What kind of books are they?
Why are the books not canonised as scriptures?
How did they come about?


These questions will be addressed in a talk to be given by Dr Tan Kim Huat on:

Date: 6 April 2006 (Thursday) ,Time: 7.30pm - 9.30pm
Venue: Wesley Methodist Church (Wesley Hall)
, 5 Fort Canning Road
Singapore 179493
Admission to the talk is free.

Do register soon to avoid disappointment as seats are limited.
Register by email at bem@bible.org.sg or by phone at 6337 3222 ext 26 (Ms Priscilla Ho).

Speaker’s Profile
Dr Tan Kim Huat is the Chen Su Lan Professor of New Testament, as well as the Dean of Trinity Theological college, Singapore. In addtion to his many scholarly interests (the chief of these being the subject of the emergence of Christianity within a Jewish matrix), he is concerned with the struggles and issues faced by ordinary church-goers. He is married to Michelle, and together they worship at Bethel Presbyterian Church.

Friday, March 17, 2006

Lent ...Lend?? Relevance?

Lent 2006 (1 March-16 April)

We are in the season of Lent again. For many in charismatic churches or non-traditional church, the word "Lent" is as strange as it can be! Is it the past simple and past participle of "lend"?? No... ... It has nothing to do with lending others things. Lent originally meant no more than the spring season. The name "Lent" comes from the Germanic (one of the branches of the Indo-European language family) root for spring. Initially the word simply meant spring, but later became associated with the fast. The name change occurred in the late Middle Ages as Catholic sermons were spoken in vernacular instead of Latin.

Basically, Lent is just a word employed to denote the forty days' fast (btw Ash Wednesday, excluding Sundays, & Easter Sunday) preceding Easter. The period of Lent recalls the forty days of our Lord's temptation. It is a season of penitence and fasting in preparation for Easter (Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ). ... a season for reflection and taking stock. It is a time of prayer and fasting in memory of our Lord's passion and death . However, as the subtitle of a CT article suggest, "Evangelical Protestants are caught between freedom in Christ and sacred observance". The Lenten Season reminds us that we have been over-indulgent, and that it would be an excellent idea to place ourselves under some kind of spiritual and physical discipline. However, do we really need a more rugged Christian discipleship during this period? Hasn’t the Anabaptists got rid of all Christian holy days.

We know that the word "Lent" nowhere appears in the NT. The same can be said of words "trinity", "providnece", etc.. Lent is also nowhere observed as a sacred season in the New Testament; hence it must be a development of later Church tradition. The same may be said, of course, of Christmas and Easter. ... The reowned preacher Charles Spurgeon said from the pulpit of the Metropolitan Tabernacle in 1871 that he certainly did not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called christmas and spoke of his abhorrence of the mass from which its name derives, but now the bible-believing churches have taken leave of their sense of righteousness and holiness and absorbed this Roman pagan festival into their worship.

Biblical Basis??

As if to forewarn against such eventualities, Paul specifically cautions the Galatians against observing "days, and months, and times, and years," and against returning in bondage to "the weak and beggarly elements." (Galatians 4:9) The NASB calls it "the weak and worthless elemental things". Still, what is this "the weak and beggarly elements"? It denote that state of religious knowledge existing among the Jews before the coming of Christ, the rudiments of religious teaching. They are "of the world," because they are made up of types which appeal to the senses. They are "weak," because insufficient; and "beggarly," or "poor," because they are dry and barren, not being accompanied by an outpouring of spiritual gifts and graces, as the gospel is.

According to the Notes on Galatians 4:9 from the Original 1599 Geneva Bible Notes, "they are called impotent and beggarly ceremonies, being considered apart by themselves without Christ: and again, by that means they gave good testimony that they were beggars in Christ, for when men fall back from Christ to ceremonies, it is nothing else but to cast away riches and to follow beggary."

But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back again to the weak and worthless elemental things, to which you desire to be enslaved all over again? (Galatians 4:9, NASB)

Why then should not evangelical Christians forget about Lent altogether, and "stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free"? Why not stand alone in blazing nonconformity, and love God, and do as we please? So, Why doesn’t my church observe Lent? (Ken Collins has an interesting article on this.) Is Lent a Catholic observance? Pope Benedict XVI marked the beginning of this year's Lent with an Ash Wednesday Mass at Rome’s Basilica of Santa Sabina. By doing so, the pope hope to renew an ancient Lenten tradition long held by the Diocese of Rome. Generally, Catholics believe that the faithful are to grow in their love of Jesus Crucified, and they are to practice extra penance for their own and other people's sins. However, is it really a case where "our Roman Catholic friends, who by and large take the Lenten season rather seriously, will smile gently at clumsy Protestant attempts to mark the occasion, and will murmur, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.""??

-------

Historically … …

The Reformed View

Historically, how do the Reformed Churches view these so called holy days?? Generally speaking, the Reformers such as Calvin, Farel, Viret, Bucer and John Knox were opposed to observing holy days such as Christmas, Easter, etc.. As they have no warrant in the word of God, they are not to be observed.The Reformers reasoned that the holy days were not divine but human institutions. They feel that the holy days brushed aside the importance of Sunday, and gave occasion to licentious and heathen festivities. The Reformers prefered the preaching of the facts of Christ's birth, death, etc. to be done on regular Sundays. For example, on the Sunday before Christmas the Christmas story was preached, etc.

In the General Meeting (1889) of the Reformed Presbyterian Church (Covenanter), a concern was also raised: The Protestant Church is fast returning to the heathen ceremonies of the Church of Rome, vieing with her in the observance of "Easter Sunday," etc. By means of Christmas trees, Santa Claus is becoming a greater reality and the object of more affection to children than the Saviour himself. --Reformed Presbyterian Church (Covenanter), Minutes of the General Meeting (1889).

G. I. Williamson (minister, Orthodox Presbyterian Church),in his On the Observance of Sacred Days (n.d.)., said that: Christmas, Good Friday, and Easter are Romish sacred days. By this we mean that they have their source in Roman Catholic tradition, rather than in Scripture. . . . [T]here have been times in the history of the Reformed churches when the truth on the subject of sacred days received reverent attention. Already, before John Calvin arrived in Geneva at the time of the great Reformation, the observance of Romish sacred days had been discontinued there. This had been done under the leadership of Guillaume Farel and Peter Viret. But Calvin was in hearty agreement. It is well known that when these traditional days came along on the calendar, Calvin did not pay the slightest attention to them. He just went right on with his exposition of whatever book of the Bible he happened to be expounding. The Reformers, Knox and Zwingli, agreed with Calvin. So did the entire Reformed church of Scotland and Holland. At the Synod of Dort in 1574 it was agreed that the weekly Sabbath alone should be observed, and that the observance of all other days should be discouraged. This faithful Biblical practice was later compromised. But that does not change the fact that the Reformed churches originally stood for the biblical principle. The original stand of the Reformed churches was Scriptural. That is the important thing.

Gordon H. Clark (professor, Covenant College, Reformed Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Synod),in The Holy Spirit (1993), too commented: It is amazing that a professor in a Presbyterian seminary should be so Romish and anti-Reformed. ... Now, Scripture does not authorize us to celebrate Pentecost. The same is true of Christmas. It began as a drunken orgy and continues so today in office parties. The Puritans even made its celebration a civil offense. And yet an argument for celebrating Pentecost was, "Don't all Christians celebrate Christmas and Easter?" No, they do not. My father's family and church never celebrated Christmas, nor did the two Blanchard administrations in Wheaton College. But what about Easter? Surely we must celebrate Easter, shouldn't we? Yes indeed, we should, as the Scripture commands, not just once a year in the spring, but fifty-two times a year.

-------


Indeed, non-Catholics should not dismiss Lent altogether. Just as every Sunday should be Easter, everyday should be Lent. Certain Scripture passages (Eccl. 3:1; Luke 22:19; Acts 20:16, and so forth) has also indicated that the Christian's observance of certain sacred periods is not wholly inappropriate. A basis for such observance may even be found in the divine order of Creation (Gen. 2:1 ff.). Surely it is not by accident that God established a rhythm in the universe, so evident in the natural order. Man is part of his universe; and just as our Lord had his seasons of prayer upon the mountain, so it is meet for us to spend time in contemplation of our Saviour and of his vicarious sacrifice in our behalf. And what better time is there for such sustained reflection than during the sacred days prior to the celebration of His resurrection?

Despite it perceived Catholic "connection", I believe that Lent still has its relevance. Rather than a time of rituals, or useless external religous observances, Lent can become a time when material things are put again in their proper secondary position; when we see in the spiritual the unconquerable forces of life. It can become a time of self-examination, when we reflect upon our present position in the pilgrimage and check our directions. It can become a time of personal readjustment, not through mental resolutions to do better but through yielding ourselves afresh to the God who demands to be obeyed. And it can become a time when, by following the battered path to Calvary, we identify ourselves once again with the Saviour who makes all things new.

However, unlike Christmas (with its Christmas tree and Santa Clause) and Easter (with its Bunny & Chocolates), Lent has not been very popular. But, as one Anglican bishop commented, the comparative lack of popular appeal that Lent exerts is not so surprising. At the heart of the “self help” culture is the picture of an individual consumer operating on his own profile and image to produce a more attractive figure. If such a person takes up religion, he tends to look on God as an asset in this process. For me, I think I have learnt that God promises new life to those who open themselves up to Him, who pass through the way of the cross, emptying themselves, so that they can be filled with the life that flows from the Godhead. Though we might have not noticed, God has become a peripheral to many of us Christians.

For me, Lent has been a period of special importance to me. Don't know if it is a coincidence..., but numerous difficulties I faced happened during the period of Lent. In 2001, 2002, 2005 and this year, I saw again and again the miraculous working of God in my life. Something that could not be explained in words happened. Non-christians have witnessed how "I" overcome this difficulty, but they do not know it was the miraculous act of God. They have asked, "How did you do it? How did the sudden improvement occur?". But deep inside, I know it was God, for the change was too great and too fast. For non-Christians (sadly, even for some Christians), miracles is something reserved for the non-interlectual, charistmatics or superstitious. They say, if we do not put in effort, will God help us? If we do not work, will God feed us? I used to believe that God only help those who help themselves. But, I have since learnt that this is not true. Instead, I've came to the conclusion that "God only help those who places their trust in Him.

For me, through the various difficulties which I faced during Lent, Lent has become a period of significance to me. Lent has become a time where I come to experience indepth the sufferings of our Lord Jesus Christ. For me, Lent is a time to recount the steps of Jesus to the cross culminating in the celebration of the resurrection on Easter Sunday. I've learned to believe (in contrast to my previous "say only") that the God who died to save us would not leave us alone to fend for ourselves. During 2005's trial, I found my faith strengthened. This year hasn't been too smooth sailing too either. But, as one Anglican Bishop wrote, "The promise of Easter is new life through the cross and resurrection of Jesus Christ but Christians have always been aware that there is an undertow in daily life that carries us away into negativity and forgetfulness. Our lives become old again. We need an annual review." We need to be constantly reminded that though we work to earn our gain, God alone is our provider!

Fasting help us to live more frugally and simply in order to tighten the drum-skin so that God’s beat can be heard more clearly in our lives. During Lent, fasting has become a part of this spiritual walk for many, but for me, despite the usefulness of fasting, Lent was more than these externals.

Christianity is right to offer a general invitation to all people to follow Christ. It is good that the threshold at the way into the Church is so low. Thereafter, however, the "demands" increase and we learn the cost of accepting the invitation to identify with Christ. The Christian life is not without its difficulties, but in our difficulties, we have Christ! I have something asked myself what is the source of these difficulties. Is it a result of trying to please my own needs and wants? I've learnt (& still learning) to ask myself whether I possess more zeal to please my own needs and wants, or to please others, than I have to please the living God.

"Stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong." --1 Corinthians 16:13.

Last of all, I believe that trials and tribulations are not without its purpose. In my difficulties, I'm remindered that Jesus' trials and sufferings were even greater.... much greater. ... and His trials and sufferings were for us! As I struggle with the difficulties of life, I am comforted by the Lord's reminder that "Men ought always to pray and not to faint." (Luke 18:1.)

"Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do?" -- Acts 9:6.

Prayer is "the time-exposure of the soul" to God. As one theologian puts it, we do not pray so that God can hear us, BUT we pray so that we can hear what God is saying to us!!

And so, my prayer is this: Our Father in heaven,I claim Thy promise through faith in Thee and Thy Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. Give me courage to maintain that faith, help me to renew my faith in Thee daily, and to share it with those with whom I live and work. AMEN.

Worship During Lent

According to the The Worship Sourcebook (pp. 551-552),

Lent invites us to make our hearts ready for remembering Jesus’ passion and celebrating Jesus’ resurrection. ... As a period of preparation, Lent has historically included the instruction of persons for baptism and profession of faith on Easter Sunday; the calling back of those who have become estranged from the church; and efforts by all Christians to deepen their piety, devotion, and readiness to mark the death and resurrection of their Savior. As such, the primary focus of the season is to explore and deepen a “baptismal spirituality” that centers on our union with Christ rather than to function only as an extended meditation on Christ’s suffering and death.

Some Thoughts:

If our faith was composed of things like bricks or glass, or straw, what a paltry thing it would be. But our faith is in God, who was there "In the beginning, God." And when the Lord said, "Let there be . . .", God made the earth, the sky and stars, and the life upon the earth. "Faith is the victory that overcomes the world."

.... ... "Not my will, but Thine be done."

"We are not as much interested in what we can get from God in the act of prayer, but more what God can do with and through us. Our interest is not so much in obtaining but in surrendering and submitting, Prayer, understood in this way, is prayer as Christ understood it and practiced it."

-------

Some References used:

The Worship Sourcebook (Faith Alive Christian Resources, Baker Books, Calvin Institute of Christian Worship, 2004)

CT Classic article. The Challenge of the Lenten Season: Evangelical Protestants are caught between freedom in Christ and sacred observance.(This article originally appeared in the March 14, 1960, issue of Christianity Today.)

Anglican Diocese of London. Give up something - take on more, 08/02/05

Sunday, March 05, 2006

A dialogue between different theological traditions: Understanding the RO


What exactly is Radical Orthodoxy (RO hereafter)?

RO calls itself a critical Augustinian movement, and much of their theoretical and political critique picks up where Augustine’s City of God left off, taking on Nietzchean and post-Nietzschean philosophy, international capitalism, and the modern nation-state in the same manner that Augustine took on Rome and her many gods and philosophers. Theology and Social Theory begins by with the claim that social theories that call themselves secular are most often either heretical versions of Christian theological claims or paganism disguised in the language of science. Subsequent books in the RO tradition expand on these claims in the arenas of city planning, economics, linguistic theories, the national security state, and several other fields that demand both practical insight and theoretical acuity.(Source: http://www.theooze.com/articles/article.cfm?id=1029)

Radical Orthodoxy is an ambitious movement of intellectuals pitched against secular modernity and its denial of the transcendent.(Source: The Spirit of Things with Rachael Kohn on Sunday 7/11/99)

From I found out, the term "Radical Orthodoxy" was not coined until the mid-to-late 90's. The first book to be published under that title was a collection of essays titled "Radical Orthodoxy: a new theology", which came out in '99. Since then, that there has actually been an academic "series" of books (Milbank, Pickstock, Ward, Cunningham, Long, Smith, Bell, Rowland et. al.).

RO is a movement that has emerged at the cutting-edge of theology and postmodern philosophy.

".... the concern for RO theologians extends beyond a critique of the modern state and its operations; it extends to why we as Christians must recognize what modernity (with its liberal state and free market) is really up to. So in the words of William Cavanaugh (the most accessible RO theologian):
The invention of religion as a private leisure activity allows people to fit into the state and market without conflict, … Private religion is meant as a refuge, a solace for tired shoppers and harried office workers. Religion helps us escape from or cope with, but not change, the frenetic pace of life in consumer society." (Source: Ashley Woodiwiss's article)

In explaining what is Radical Orthodoxy, Gregory F. McCormick wrote that:
  • RO tends to refuse dualities of faith and reason and of nature and grace, resisting the idea of a purely fideistic, biblically-based narrative theology that is innocent of metaphysics and ontology.
  • RO refuses natural theology and a lot of the usual approaches pursued in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion.
  • RO intimates that analytic philosophy of religion pays no real attention to central developments in twentieth-century philosophy, analytic as well as continental.
  • RO believes that it is very important to have both a rooting in biblical exegesis, and an interest in speculative reflection. It sees no vast difference between the narrative imagistic mode of the bible, and philosophical discourse “about” the bible because there is, despite everything, something like philosophy in the bible; conversely, Greek philosophy is very closely linked to mythology, narrative and history.
  • The other major orientation in radical orthodoxy is towards post-modernism.
  • RO is so unapologetically committed to exploring metaphysical questions in detail as it believe that their neglect (or rejection) by theology leaves Christianity as a set of weird, ultimate beliefs in which Christians simply believe in life after death, which is an attitude that does not seem to connect with the perceived facts of the world.
  • RO resists the idea that we should give up on the cosmological, since such an abandonment would be to try and occupy a purely humanist space, which has now been overturned.

James K.A. Smith, of the Kuyperian Dutch Reformed tradition says:
RO is advocating a distinctly theological engagement with the world - and the academy that investigates this world - undergirded by the belief that the way to engage the contemporary world is not by trying to demonstrate a correlation between the gospel and cultural values but rather by letting the gospel confront these (apostate) values...The truth telos [goal] of the RO project is not simply a theology but a comprehensive Christian account of every aspect of the world - a properly and radically Christian account of social relationships, economic organization, political formation, aesthetic expression, and so on, engendering a radically Christian sociology, a radically Christian economics, and so forth....Because of this conviction, RO had (in)famously eschewed 'dialogue' with secular discplines. Unlike correlationist strategies that defer the 'truth' of the natural sphere to secular sciences...RO claims that there is not a single aspect of human existence or creation that can be properly understood or described apart from the insights of revelation.


However, if we want to know more on what this movement is about—its key thinkers and their texts, its strengths, and its weaknesses—then, James K.A. Smith's recently published volume, Introducing Radical Orthodoxy (Baker Books, 2004) fits our purpose.

Smith announces at the outset that he writes for three audiences:
1) the academy of theorists, graduate students, and advanced undergraduates; 2) theologians, both in the movement itself and in the Reformed tradition (in which Smith places himself); and
3) the church, in particular its pastors, worship directors, and other leaders.

So, I think this book shouldn't be too difficult!!


Radical Orthodoxy and the Reformed Tradition: Creation, Covenant, and Participation

Often, it is difficult for a dialogue between different theological traditions to take place. It is not easy to genuinely engage another tradition nondefensively, and with both charity and firmness. This book is a good example of this aspect which many who engages in dialogue seriously need.

Author: James K. A. Smith and James H. Olthuis, eds.
Edition: Paperback
Number of Pages: 304

Description:
In this work, leading scholars compare the differences and points of intersection between Radical Orthodoxy and the Reformed tradition.

James K. A. Smith and James H. Olthuis compiled this volume with the goal of mutual interaction, "expecting that RO could offer corrective lenses for some myopic aspects of the Reformed tradition, but we also thought there were ways in which RO could use a little reforming." More specifically, this timely discussion deals with many topics in current scholarly theological and philosophical debates, including participation, aesthetics, politics, covenant, and cultural theory. It represents an emerging willingness among RO proponents to examine and engage the Dutch Reformed tradition, and Calvin in particular, as well as the growing influence of RO on the Reformed tradition.

The book includes contributions from leading proponents of RO as well as leading Reformed scholars:

James K. A. Smith
John Milbank
Graham Ward
Robert Sweetman
Adrienne Dengerink Chaplin
Michael Horton
Lambert Zuidevaart
Jonathan Chaplin
Hans Boersma
Laura Smit
Nathan Kerr
Justin Holcomb
George Vandervelde
James H. Olthuis

This book offers a constructive dialogue that will appeal to scholars concerned with the intersection between RO and the Reformed tradition. A companion book to Smith's recently published Introducing Radical Orthodoxy, it will also be of interest to upper level college and seminary students of philosophy and theology.

Author Information:
James K. A. Smith (Ph.D., Villanova University) is associate professor of philosophy and director of the Seminars in Christian Scholarship at Calvin College. He is the author of Introducing Radical Orthodoxy and Speech and Theology.

James H. Olthuis (Ph.D., Free University) is emeritus professor of philosophical theology at the Institute for Christian Studies in Toronto. He is the author or editor of numerous books.

Endorsements: "The essays in this collection undertake a new sort of ecumenical theology based not on mutual concession but on the positive collective forging of a genuinely reformed Catholicism and a genuinely Catholic reform."--Catherine Pickstock, lecturer in the philosophy of religion, University of Cambridge

"This collection of essays constitutes an important and admirable dialogue between proponents of Radical Orthodoxy and the Reformed tradition, displaying areas of convergence as well as raising questions that require further discussion. While the book will be of particular interest to those committed to Radical Orthodoxy and/or the Reformed tradition, it should also be helpful to readers from all traditions who are interested in engaging and appropriating the insights of Radical Orthodoxy in the context of their own confessional commitments."--John R. Franke, professor of theology, Biblical Theological Seminary

"Attempts at dialogue between different theological traditions are more often failures than not as representatives of the different traditions defensively talk past each other. Radical Orthodoxy and the Reformed Tradition is a signal exception. The participants in the dialogue genuinely engage each tradition nondefensively with both charity and firmness. The result is not only fascinating but also informative. Each tradition gets illuminated in the process, surprising convergences appear, differences are explored, and the options are clarified. It is a great contribution."--Nicholas Wolterstorff, Noah Porter Professor Emeritus of Philosophical Theology, Yale University

Information on RO:
Gregory F. McCormick's Radical Orthodoxy.

The Spirit of Things with Rachael Kohn on Sunday 7/11/99:
Rejecting Modernity: Radical Orthodoxy

Ashley Woodiwiss's article What's so Radical about Orthodoxy? Introducing Introducing Radical Orthodoxy and the project to "re-narrate" reality without the word secular.

John Milbanks's Radical Orthodoxy; A New Theology. (Routledge, 1998)

Friday, March 03, 2006

Transcripts:Stephen Tong on the Reformed Movement

Seminar on the Reformed faith in Singapore
A 4-day (Feb 23-26 ) theological seminar by Reverend Dr Stephen Tong on the topic of the Reformed Movement was held at Newton Life Church.

Personally, I've always been very encouraged by his messages, whether it's the exposition of Romans, hebrews or james. On the topic of the Reformed Movement, He too encourages the Church to move towards a living that is more consistent with what the bible espouses. If you missed Stephen Tong's reformed seminar, here are the notes of the theological seminar which a wonderful lady (though i do not know her!!) called Mejlina uploaded. I hope that you'll be similarly encouraged!

The links:
23rd Feb Introduction to Reformed Evangelical Movement
24th Feb Its History
25th Feb Its Position
26th Feb Its Direction

For more information about him, one can visit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Tonghttp://www.stemi.org/

The essence of his message is -
Important aspects of Christian faith:
1. Strong orthodox foundation - like the skeleton that gives framework
2. Evangelical fervency - like the flesh that cover the skeleton
3. Holy Spirit's work - like the blood that flows through our body, this makes a difference between a mechanical thing and a living being. The Church is the Body of Christ.

Our task:
1. Gospel Mandate - to the chosen ones
2. Culture Mandate - to the entire world

Reformed foundation:
Core Values: Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia, Solus Christus, Soli Deo Gloria

Direction :
God-centered religion, God-centered theology, God-centered faith, God-centered church, God-centered pulpit

History to understand the modern world: Renaissance, Reformation, Enlightenment

Call:
To return to God-centered foundation & to decisively surrender ourselves and sacrifice our lives for the right faith.